For Cycle 22 #802
Labels
parsed:valid
https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid
team:dev
https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team
was:rejected
Indicates that a compensation request was rejected by DAO voting
Milestone
Summary
2479
Contributions delivered
A sidenote to this: It is pretty sad that Bisq treats his contributors that way. First, the desperately needed measures get delayed, then project proposals are required, then the proposals get ignored, then delayed and finally, after the work is done, someone comes along, uses the production-ready code to create a similar PR which then gets merged and all the work done over months are denied compensation. It seems like again Bisq only values a written line of code - not the data collection, investigation, design steps to create a proper solution.
Besides that, I know, I already left the project. And there are people in Bisq which seem to be very keen to get me out. And after I am gone there is no point in compensating anything really - it is at least common practice in the industry. And I firmly believed that Bisq is different, yet, Bisq steals from me. 1k5$ (#709 (comment)) for the project is not compensation, it is a message - and I got it the first time around.
That being said, may Bisq prevail, I certainly hope so. Yet, I fear that there are some radical changes necessary which might not come in time.
Contributions in progress
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: