Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - Only Loan out if current rate is better than existing #39

Closed
rje8686 opened this issue Apr 7, 2016 · 17 comments
Closed

Comments

@rje8686
Copy link

rje8686 commented Apr 7, 2016

Hi,

Really enjoy using the bot. The one issue i have is whether to keep the auto renew on or off.

Say the best loan rate is currently 0.1% and i have the following loans -

1 BTC - 0.2%
2 BTC - 0.05%

I want to keep the 0.2% with auto-renew on and remove auto renew on the 0.05% loan so i can get it loaned out at a better rate.

Is this possible?

Thanks!

R

@rje8686 rje8686 changed the title Feature Request Feature Request - Only Loan out if current rate is better than existing Apr 7, 2016
@Mikadily
Copy link
Collaborator

Mikadily commented Apr 7, 2016

Why would you want that, if your bot is always online?

@Webonaute
Copy link

if the market go down when your lending end, if you have auto-renew, it will only renew to the same %. and nobody will take it because market is way under your %. So this feature demand doesnt make sense!

@rje8686
Copy link
Author

rje8686 commented Apr 11, 2016

Ah I see. Thanks for the clarification!

I want to loan out BTC with a min of 0.04% and DASH with a min of 0.1% how is this possible? Do i just need to edit the #coinconfig line?

@ghostnegotiator
Copy link

This would be the coin config your looking for:

coinconfig = ["BTC:0.04:5","DSH:0.01:5"]

@Webonaute
Copy link

was going to write same thing

@rje8686
Copy link
Author

rje8686 commented Apr 11, 2016

I tried. Doesnt seem to work still lending DSH at lower rate.

@ghostnegotiator
Copy link

Sorry forgot to type the A... this should work, although its around 0.03 right now.

coinconfig = ["BTC:0.04:5","DASH:0.1:5"]

@rje8686
Copy link
Author

rje8686 commented Apr 11, 2016

my setting -
mindailyrate = 0.04
#coinconfig = ["BTC:0.04:5","DASH:0.1:5"]

Is still lending DASH at 0.0404%

I just tried this -

#coinconfig = ["BTC:0.04:5","DASH:0.1:0"] and it is still lending the coin.

@m33Lucky
Copy link

hi new to this , i have ltc and xmr , ltc i like a min of. 0.001 , xmr 0.018 , how should i edit my coinconfig . note no btc or any other coins atm. thanks for all reply

@ghostnegotiator
Copy link

@rje8686 people would still have to pay back the lending, when setting the last option at 0 it means it wont lend out new ones. It should return back into your wallet when people paid it off :)

Also note: You have it commented with an Hashtag (#) which means that option is switched off.

@ghostnegotiator
Copy link

@m33Lucky use this coin config:

coinconfig = ["LTC:0.001:5","XMR:0.018:5"]

@m33Lucky
Copy link

@RDash21 in the coinconfig = ["Xmr:0.018:5"]
The 5 means 5 lends ?
Must this number be same as the spread lend?
Bot now dumps max amount after min daily rate of 0.018

@ghostnegotiator
Copy link

@m33Lucky it means it will trade 0.018 Minimal daily rate and up to 5% maximal daily rate.

@Mikadily
Copy link
Collaborator

@RDash21 you're almost right :)
5 - is how many coins you want to lend, but it's not fully implemented yet. It only works in two different ways: if it's 0 - stop lending the coin, if it's something else - lend all. The idea was in the future to put a limit on coins, so you could withdraw half etc., but it's not as simple to code it.

@rje8686
Copy link
Author

rje8686 commented Apr 13, 2016

does it override the min dailyrate line?
will BTC be lent at 0.05 or 0.04?

my setting -
mindailyrate = 0.04
#coinconfig = ["BTC:0.05:5","DASH:0.1:5"]

@Mikadily
Copy link
Collaborator

@rje8686 yes it does. But do you know that '#' in front of the line means it's a comment - this option is not active. To put into effect please remove '#'.

@Evanito
Copy link
Member

Evanito commented May 11, 2016

Closing due to inactivity and solution found.

@Evanito Evanito closed this as completed May 11, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants