Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make ripe160 preconditions be consistent like the other hashing functions #464

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2014

Conversation

ethers
Copy link
Contributor

@ethers ethers commented Jul 27, 2014

other hashing functions do not have this check.

ran all tests and they all passed.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.73%) when pulling 7353511 on ethers:ripe160 into f2f4ca7 on bitpay:master.

ryanxcharles pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2014
make ripe160 preconditions be consistent like the other hashing functions
@ryanxcharles ryanxcharles merged commit 26f6770 into bitpay:master Jul 27, 2014
micahriggan pushed a commit to micahriggan/bitcore that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants