Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New faucet according to infrastructure worker proposal #867

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

xeroc
Copy link
Member

@xeroc xeroc commented Dec 14, 2017

This is the onboarding faucet.

Stats and settings can be found here:

@svk31
Copy link
Contributor

svk31 commented Dec 14, 2017

So just to make sure we don't get lots of complaints like last time, it's safe to just replace the old one with this one? Referrals will work the same?

@btsfav
Copy link

btsfav commented Dec 14, 2017

@svk31 could you provide a testversion, if you go time?

@svk31 svk31 merged commit 0992baf into staging Dec 15, 2017
@svk31 svk31 deleted the new-faucet branch December 15, 2017 08:46
@svk31
Copy link
Contributor

svk31 commented Dec 15, 2017

Yes I will provide one that you can test over the weekend.

@xeroc
Copy link
Member Author

xeroc commented Dec 15, 2017

@svk31 if you try register an account with the name starting with test-faucet (e.g. test-faucet3253252) the faucet will not actually register the account but do everything as usual and return the raw transaction to you ..

@xeroc
Copy link
Member Author

xeroc commented Dec 15, 2017

So just to make sure we don't get lots of complaints like last time, it's safe to just replace the old one with this one? Referrals will work the same?

Referals should work the same .. i did quite some tests on the new "selection" algorithm to distinguish different modes of operation

Cryptolero pushed a commit to CryptoBridge/cryptobridge-ui that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants