Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Auto merge of rust-lang#104711 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-gkw1qr8, r=Dylan-DPC
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104295 (Check generics parity before collecting return-position `impl Trait`s in trait)
 - rust-lang#104464 (Reduce exceptions overallocation on non Windows x86_64)
 - rust-lang#104615 (Create def_id for async fns during lowering)
 - rust-lang#104669 (Only declare bindings for if-let guards once per arm)
 - rust-lang#104701 (Remove a lifetime resolution hack from `compare_predicate_entailment`)
 - rust-lang#104710 (disable strict-provenance-violating doctests in Miri)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
  • Loading branch information
bors committed Nov 22, 2022
2 parents b7463e8 + a40659d commit 66ccf36
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 15 changed files with 114 additions and 69 deletions.
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1817,9 +1817,11 @@ impl<'a, 'hir> LoweringContext<'a, 'hir> {

let opaque_ty_span = self.mark_span_with_reason(DesugaringKind::Async, span, None);

let opaque_ty_def_id = self.local_def_id(opaque_ty_node_id);
let fn_def_id = self.local_def_id(fn_node_id);

let opaque_ty_def_id =
self.create_def(fn_def_id, opaque_ty_node_id, DefPathData::ImplTrait);

// When we create the opaque type for this async fn, it is going to have
// to capture all the lifetimes involved in the signature (including in the
// return type). This is done by introducing lifetime parameters for:
Expand Down
80 changes: 37 additions & 43 deletions compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/compare_method.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,10 +14,8 @@ use rustc_infer::traits::util;
use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
use rustc_middle::ty::util::ExplicitSelf;
use rustc_middle::ty::{
self, AssocItem, DefIdTree, TraitRef, Ty, TypeFoldable, TypeFolder, TypeSuperFoldable,
TypeVisitable,
self, DefIdTree, InternalSubsts, Ty, TypeFoldable, TypeFolder, TypeSuperFoldable, TypeVisitable,
};
use rustc_middle::ty::{FnSig, InternalSubsts};
use rustc_middle::ty::{GenericParamDefKind, ToPredicate, TyCtxt};
use rustc_span::Span;
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::error_reporting::TypeErrCtxtExt;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -51,11 +49,11 @@ pub(crate) fn compare_impl_method<'tcx>(
return;
}

if let Err(_) = compare_number_of_generics(tcx, impl_m, impl_m_span, trait_m, trait_item_span) {
if let Err(_) = compare_number_of_generics(tcx, impl_m, trait_m, trait_item_span, false) {
return;
}

if let Err(_) = compare_generic_param_kinds(tcx, impl_m, trait_m) {
if let Err(_) = compare_generic_param_kinds(tcx, impl_m, trait_m, false) {
return;
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -144,9 +142,9 @@ pub(crate) fn compare_impl_method<'tcx>(
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx, impl_m_span, impl_trait_ref))]
fn compare_predicate_entailment<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
impl_m: &AssocItem,
impl_m: &ty::AssocItem,
impl_m_span: Span,
trait_m: &AssocItem,
trait_m: &ty::AssocItem,
impl_trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
let trait_to_impl_substs = impl_trait_ref.substs;
Expand All @@ -157,8 +155,7 @@ fn compare_predicate_entailment<'tcx>(
// FIXME(@lcnr): remove that after removing `cause.body_id` from
// obligations.
let impl_m_hir_id = tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(impl_m.def_id.expect_local());
// We sometimes modify the span further down.
let mut cause = ObligationCause::new(
let cause = ObligationCause::new(
impl_m_span,
impl_m_hir_id,
ObligationCauseCode::CompareImplItemObligation {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -291,30 +288,19 @@ fn compare_predicate_entailment<'tcx>(
// type would be more appropriate. In other places we have a `Vec<Span>`
// corresponding to their `Vec<Predicate>`, but we don't have that here.
// Fixing this would improve the output of test `issue-83765.rs`.
let mut result = ocx.sup(&cause, param_env, trait_fty, impl_fty);

// HACK(RPITIT): #101614. When we are trying to infer the hidden types for
// RPITITs, we need to equate the output tys instead of just subtyping. If
// we just use `sup` above, we'll end up `&'static str <: _#1t`, which causes
// us to infer `_#1t = #'_#2r str`, where `'_#2r` is unconstrained, which gets
// fixed up to `ReEmpty`, and which is certainly not what we want.
if trait_fty.has_infer_types() {
result =
result.and_then(|()| ocx.eq(&cause, param_env, trait_sig.output(), impl_sig.output()));
}
let result = ocx.sup(&cause, param_env, trait_fty, impl_fty);

if let Err(terr) = result {
debug!(?terr, "sub_types failed: impl ty {:?}, trait ty {:?}", impl_fty, trait_fty);

let emitted = report_trait_method_mismatch(
tcx,
&mut cause,
&infcx,
cause,
terr,
(trait_m, trait_fty),
(impl_m, impl_fty),
&trait_sig,
&impl_trait_ref,
trait_sig,
impl_trait_ref,
);
return Err(emitted);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -352,11 +338,15 @@ pub fn collect_trait_impl_trait_tys<'tcx>(
let impl_trait_ref = tcx.impl_trait_ref(impl_m.impl_container(tcx).unwrap()).unwrap();
let param_env = tcx.param_env(def_id);

// First, check a few of the same thing as `compare_impl_method`, just so we don't ICE during substitutions later.
compare_number_of_generics(tcx, impl_m, trait_m, tcx.hir().span_if_local(impl_m.def_id), true)?;
compare_generic_param_kinds(tcx, impl_m, trait_m, true)?;

let trait_to_impl_substs = impl_trait_ref.substs;

let impl_m_hir_id = tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(impl_m.def_id.expect_local());
let return_span = tcx.hir().fn_decl_by_hir_id(impl_m_hir_id).unwrap().output.span();
let mut cause = ObligationCause::new(
let cause = ObligationCause::new(
return_span,
impl_m_hir_id,
ObligationCauseCode::CompareImplItemObligation {
Expand All @@ -376,6 +366,7 @@ pub fn collect_trait_impl_trait_tys<'tcx>(
let infcx = &tcx.infer_ctxt().build();
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);

// Normalize the impl signature with fresh variables for lifetime inference.
let norm_cause = ObligationCause::misc(return_span, impl_m_hir_id);
let impl_sig = ocx.normalize(
norm_cause.clone(),
Expand All @@ -388,6 +379,10 @@ pub fn collect_trait_impl_trait_tys<'tcx>(
);
let impl_return_ty = impl_sig.output();

// Normalize the trait signature with liberated bound vars, passing it through
// the ImplTraitInTraitCollector, which gathers all of the RPITITs and replaces
// them with inference variables.
// We will use these inference variables to collect the hidden types of RPITITs.
let mut collector = ImplTraitInTraitCollector::new(&ocx, return_span, param_env, impl_m_hir_id);
let unnormalized_trait_sig = tcx
.liberate_late_bound_regions(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -448,14 +443,13 @@ pub fn collect_trait_impl_trait_tys<'tcx>(
// emit an error now because `compare_predicate_entailment` will not report the error
// when normalization fails.
let emitted = report_trait_method_mismatch(
tcx,
&mut cause,
infcx,
cause,
terr,
(trait_m, trait_fty),
(impl_m, impl_fty),
&trait_sig,
&impl_trait_ref,
trait_sig,
impl_trait_ref,
);
return Err(emitted);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -625,23 +619,21 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeFolder<'tcx> for ImplTraitInTraitCollector<'_, 'tcx> {
}

fn report_trait_method_mismatch<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
cause: &mut ObligationCause<'tcx>,
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
mut cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>,
terr: TypeError<'tcx>,
(trait_m, trait_fty): (&AssocItem, Ty<'tcx>),
(impl_m, impl_fty): (&AssocItem, Ty<'tcx>),
trait_sig: &FnSig<'tcx>,
impl_trait_ref: &TraitRef<'tcx>,
(trait_m, trait_fty): (&ty::AssocItem, Ty<'tcx>),
(impl_m, impl_fty): (&ty::AssocItem, Ty<'tcx>),
trait_sig: ty::FnSig<'tcx>,
impl_trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>,
) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
let (impl_err_span, trait_err_span) =
extract_spans_for_error_reporting(&infcx, terr, &cause, impl_m, trait_m);

cause.span = impl_err_span;

let mut diag = struct_span_err!(
tcx.sess,
cause.span(),
impl_err_span,
E0053,
"method `{}` has an incompatible type for trait",
trait_m.name
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -712,6 +704,7 @@ fn report_trait_method_mismatch<'tcx>(
_ => {}
}

cause.span = impl_err_span;
infcx.err_ctxt().note_type_err(
&mut diag,
&cause,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -922,9 +915,9 @@ fn compare_self_type<'tcx>(
fn compare_number_of_generics<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
impl_: &ty::AssocItem,
_impl_span: Span,
trait_: &ty::AssocItem,
trait_span: Option<Span>,
delay: bool,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
let trait_own_counts = tcx.generics_of(trait_.def_id).own_counts();
let impl_own_counts = tcx.generics_of(impl_.def_id).own_counts();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1054,7 +1047,7 @@ fn compare_number_of_generics<'tcx>(
err.span_label(*span, "`impl Trait` introduces an implicit type parameter");
}

let reported = err.emit();
let reported = err.emit_unless(delay);
err_occurred = Some(reported);
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1306,6 +1299,7 @@ fn compare_generic_param_kinds<'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
impl_item: &ty::AssocItem,
trait_item: &ty::AssocItem,
delay: bool,
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
assert_eq!(impl_item.kind, trait_item.kind);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1363,7 +1357,7 @@ fn compare_generic_param_kinds<'tcx>(
err.span_label(impl_header_span, "");
err.span_label(param_impl_span, make_param_message("found", param_impl));

let reported = err.emit();
let reported = err.emit_unless(delay);
return Err(reported);
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1489,9 +1483,9 @@ pub(crate) fn compare_ty_impl<'tcx>(
debug!("compare_impl_type(impl_trait_ref={:?})", impl_trait_ref);

let _: Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> = (|| {
compare_number_of_generics(tcx, impl_ty, impl_ty_span, trait_ty, trait_item_span)?;
compare_number_of_generics(tcx, impl_ty, trait_ty, trait_item_span, false)?;

compare_generic_param_kinds(tcx, impl_ty, trait_ty)?;
compare_generic_param_kinds(tcx, impl_ty, trait_ty, false)?;

let sp = tcx.def_span(impl_ty.def_id);
compare_type_predicate_entailment(tcx, impl_ty, sp, trait_ty, impl_trait_ref)?;
Expand Down
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/block.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
use crate::build::matches::ArmHasGuard;
use crate::build::ForGuard::OutsideGuard;
use crate::build::{BlockAnd, BlockAndExtension, BlockFrame, Builder};
use rustc_middle::middle::region::Scope;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -231,7 +230,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
visibility_scope,
remainder_span,
pattern,
ArmHasGuard(false),
None,
Some((None, initializer_span)),
);
this.visit_primary_bindings(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -308,7 +307,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
visibility_scope,
remainder_span,
pattern,
ArmHasGuard(false),
None,
Some((None, initializer_span)),
);
this.expr_into_pattern(block, &pattern, init)
Expand All @@ -324,7 +323,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
visibility_scope,
remainder_span,
pattern,
ArmHasGuard(false),
None,
None,
);
block.unit()
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/expr/into.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
ExprKind::Let { expr, ref pat } => {
let scope = this.local_scope();
let (true_block, false_block) = this.in_if_then_scope(scope, expr_span, |this| {
this.lower_let_expr(block, &this.thir[expr], pat, scope, None, expr_span)
this.lower_let_expr(block, &this.thir[expr], pat, scope, None, expr_span, true)
});

this.cfg.push_assign_constant(
Expand Down
26 changes: 15 additions & 11 deletions compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
break_scope,
Some(variable_source_info.scope),
variable_source_info.span,
true,
),
_ => {
let temp_scope = temp_scope_override.unwrap_or_else(|| this.local_scope());
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
None,
arm.span,
&arm.pattern,
ArmHasGuard(arm.guard.is_some()),
arm.guard.as_ref(),
opt_scrutinee_place,
);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
mut visibility_scope: Option<SourceScope>,
scope_span: Span,
pattern: &Pat<'tcx>,
has_guard: ArmHasGuard,
guard: Option<&Guard<'tcx>>,
opt_match_place: Option<(Option<&Place<'tcx>>, Span)>,
) -> Option<SourceScope> {
self.visit_primary_bindings(
Expand All @@ -667,12 +668,16 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
var,
ty,
user_ty,
has_guard,
ArmHasGuard(guard.is_some()),
opt_match_place.map(|(x, y)| (x.cloned(), y)),
pattern.span,
);
},
);
if let Some(Guard::IfLet(guard_pat, _)) = guard {
// FIXME: pass a proper `opt_match_place`
self.declare_bindings(visibility_scope, scope_span, guard_pat, None, None);
}
visibility_scope
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1766,6 +1771,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
// Pat binding - used for `let` and function parameters as well.

impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
/// If the bindings have already been declared, set `declare_bindings` to
/// `false` to avoid duplicated bindings declaration. Used for if-let guards.
pub(crate) fn lower_let_expr(
&mut self,
mut block: BasicBlock,
Expand All @@ -1774,6 +1781,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
else_target: region::Scope,
source_scope: Option<SourceScope>,
span: Span,
declare_bindings: bool,
) -> BlockAnd<()> {
let expr_span = expr.span;
let expr_place_builder = unpack!(block = self.lower_scrutinee(block, expr, expr_span));
Expand All @@ -1797,13 +1805,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
let otherwise_post_guard_block = otherwise_candidate.pre_binding_block.unwrap();
self.break_for_else(otherwise_post_guard_block, else_target, self.source_info(expr_span));

self.declare_bindings(
source_scope,
pat.span.to(span),
pat,
ArmHasGuard(false),
opt_expr_place,
);
if declare_bindings {
self.declare_bindings(source_scope, pat.span.to(span), pat, None, opt_expr_place);
}

let post_guard_block = self.bind_pattern(
self.source_info(pat.span),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1984,7 +1988,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
Guard::IfLet(ref pat, scrutinee) => {
let s = &this.thir[scrutinee];
guard_span = s.span;
this.lower_let_expr(block, s, pat, match_scope, None, arm.span)
this.lower_let_expr(block, s, pat, match_scope, None, arm.span, false)
}
});

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
scope,
expr.span,
&pat,
matches::ArmHasGuard(false),
None,
Some((Some(&place), span)),
);
let place_builder = PlaceBuilder::from(local);
Expand Down
9 changes: 2 additions & 7 deletions compiler/rustc_resolve/src/def_collector.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -131,22 +131,17 @@ impl<'a, 'b> visit::Visitor<'a> for DefCollector<'a, 'b> {

fn visit_fn(&mut self, fn_kind: FnKind<'a>, span: Span, _: NodeId) {
if let FnKind::Fn(_, _, sig, _, generics, body) = fn_kind {
if let Async::Yes { closure_id, return_impl_trait_id, .. } = sig.header.asyncness {
if let Async::Yes { closure_id, .. } = sig.header.asyncness {
self.visit_generics(generics);

let return_impl_trait_id =
self.create_def(return_impl_trait_id, DefPathData::ImplTrait, span);

// For async functions, we need to create their inner defs inside of a
// closure to match their desugared representation. Besides that,
// we must mirror everything that `visit::walk_fn` below does.
self.visit_fn_header(&sig.header);
for param in &sig.decl.inputs {
self.visit_param(param);
}
self.with_parent(return_impl_trait_id, |this| {
this.visit_fn_ret_ty(&sig.decl.output)
});
self.visit_fn_ret_ty(&sig.decl.output);
// If this async fn has no body (i.e. it's an async fn signature in a trait)
// then the closure_def will never be used, and we should avoid generating a
// def-id for it.
Expand Down
Loading

0 comments on commit 66ccf36

Please sign in to comment.