You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We tested with different dilation rates for the WASP module and found that the rates of {6,12,18,24} yield the best results. Reversing the order {6,12,18,24} to {24,18,12,6} didn't significantly change the result. The main factor is having the different dilation rates before starting to lose accuracy for rates higher than the one we used.
Why did you set dilation rate as [24,18,12,6] rather than [6,12,18,24]?
thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: