Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Smartnet & cqpsk vs fsk4 #200

Closed
rfuchs opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Smartnet & cqpsk vs fsk4 #200

rfuchs opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@rfuchs
Copy link

rfuchs commented Jan 19, 2024

Hi,

Is there a reason why the smartnet NB FM demodulator is only enabled for fsk4 channels but not for cqpsk channels? See https://github.com/boatbod/op25/blob/master/op25/gr-op25_repeater/apps/p25_demodulator_dev.py#L531

I'm listening to https://www.radioreference.com/db/sid/861 and with fsk4 I get distorted digital audio but good FM, and with cqpsk I get good digital audio but no FM. Patching up that line to also allow cqpsk makes things work.

Is this an oversight or have I configured something wrong?

@boatbod
Copy link
Owner

boatbod commented Jan 21, 2024 via email

@rfuchs
Copy link
Author

rfuchs commented Jan 21, 2024

Yeah I tried with the default settings (fsk4/widepulse) first and that gave me very choppy audio. For some reason changing to cqpsk made it work. BUT fsk4/rc also seems to work perfectly. Solved, thanks!

@rfuchs rfuchs closed this as completed Jan 21, 2024
@boatbod
Copy link
Owner

boatbod commented Jan 21, 2024 via email

@rfuchs
Copy link
Author

rfuchs commented Jan 21, 2024

Do you know if your Smartnet system is simulcast?  Widepulse (for simulcast) increases the filter bandwidth vs the rc filter used by standard P25.

No idea. Is there a way I can tell? Otherwise I only know what's listed on RR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants