Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenMax baseline experimental configuration in Few-shot setting #2

Open
MinkiJ opened this issue Aug 7, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

OpenMax baseline experimental configuration in Few-shot setting #2

MinkiJ opened this issue Aug 7, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@MinkiJ
Copy link

MinkiJ commented Aug 7, 2020

Hi, thank you for sharing your experimental code.

In the paper, the OpenMax baseline uses the negative of distances like ProtoNet.

But, the lower $\omega$ value in OpenMax indicates the query sample is more likely to be an unknown sample.
Therefore, I think the OpenMax method assumes all elements in the activation vector to be non-negative.
However the logits of ProtoNet are non-positive, which is inconsistent with the assumption.

Also, since there is a single sample for each class in 1-shot cases, it is nearly impossible to fit the Weibull model using supports as stated in the OpenMax paper (e.g. The OpenMax code uses 20 samples for each class to fit the Weibull model).

Due to those problems, I could not reproduce your result on the baselines.

Could you give more detailed information to reproduce your baselines (Openmax & Counterfactual)?

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant