Random search

[NAThompson]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 32 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (31b76ee) 85.22% compared to head (34d5e13) 85.22%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1071   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    85.22%   85.22%           
========================================
  Files          877      879    +2     
  Lines        66819    66899   +80     
========================================
+ Hits         56948    57018   +70     
- Misses        9871     9881   +10     

Files	Coverage Δ
include/boost/math/optimization/jso.hpp	81.21% <100.00%> (ø)
test/cardinal_cubic_b_spline_test.cpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/differential_evolution_test.cpp	59.70% <100.00%> (ø)
test/fourier_transform_daubechies_test.cpp	96.80% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
test/gauss_quadrature_test.cpp	94.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
test/random_search_test.cpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/test_functions_for_optimization.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
test/math_unit_test.hpp	24.00% <12.50%> (ø)
include/boost/math/optimization/random_search.hpp	72.72% <72.72%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 31b76ee...34d5e13. Read the comment docs.

[ckormanyos]

Hi @NAThompson I just found a random instance of something random that looked very close to expectation and might somehow be related to some of this recent work.

In a completely unrelated CI that had no association with this work, I think some runner found a random outlier here.

[NAThompson]

@ckormanyos : Bah, I thought I'd fixed that one. Hopefully fixed permanently here.