-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better support for non-ASCII characters when LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX is used? #255
Comments
One solution: Consider using the libertinus font package, which fixes bugs in Libertine and adds a proper math font version compatible with @borisveytsman I would love to write conference papers with |
It would be great to see |
+1. Better support for Lua and unicode-math would be a good idea. |
Filed #398 on the libertinus switch, hoping it'll get more attention. |
The fonts chosen by
acmart
have little support for non-ASCII characters when LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX is used. For instance, consider the following UTF8-encoded file:If I process this file using
lualatex
, then the following warnings are printed:With
xelatex
I get the following warnings:The problem can be partially fixed by using
fontspec
:Now the first occurrence of
∀
is typeset, but not the second one. If I remove theno-math
option, then the second occurrence is also typeset, but not in the same way as$\forall$
, and the digit2
is also typeset in a different way.Is there some way to use
fontspec
(and perhapsunicode-math
) to provide support for a large set of additional characters, without changing the appearance of characters that are currently supported?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: