-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lps 88361 #65819
Lps 88361 #65819
Conversation
…we must have a ActionMapping or strutsAction, they can not be both missing.
… is always an exact match.
…we must have a ActionMapping or strutsAction, they can not be both missing. So actionMapping is impossible to be null here.
…nalAction(), so that we don't need to do a refetch in _processActionCreate
…tion, better to drop support of it to keep design simple.
…sp.jsp", there is no need of the map.
…, so that we don't need StrutsPortletFindActionHelper and BaseStrutsPortletFindActionHelper anymore
…but this usage here does not set a struts_action, switch to use base class
CI is automatically triggering "ci:test:sf" and "ci:test:relevant" for this pull to run Source Formatter and relevant tests. Comment "ci:test" to run the full PR Tester for this pull. |
❌ ci:test:sf - 0 out of 1 jobs passed in 2 minutes 28 seconds 936 msClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: LPS-88361 1 Failed Jobs:For more details click here.
|
The pull request tester is still running.Please wait until you get the final report before running 'ci:retest'. See this link to check on the status of your test: However, the pull request was closed.The pull request was closed because the following critical batches had failed: For information as to why we automatically close out certain pull requests see this article. *If you believe this is a mistake please reopen this pull by entering the following command as a comment. ci:reopen*The reopened pull request may be automatically closed again if other critical batches or tests fail. Critical Failure Details:❌ ci:test:sf - 0 out of 1 jobs passed in 2 minutes 33 seconds 531 msClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: LPS-88361 1 Failed Jobs:For more details click here.
cc @jpince
|
@shuyangzhou can you resend? Thx. |
Sorry, fixed SF, resent here #65820 |
❌ ci:test:relevant - 0 out of 1 jobs passed in 1 minute 10 seconds 889 msClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Copied in Private Modules Branch:0 out of 1 jobs PASSED1 Failed Jobs:For more details click here.Failures unique to this pull:
For upstream results, click here. |
@brianchandotcom after this pull, we are technically done, as we no longer use any Struts binaries.
But the struts name is still all over our codebase. To clean them up may still take a while. Because a lot of them can actually be removed or at least rewrite in some different ways. I want to clean them up in the right way rather than just rename them.
Another thing is, quite a few "Struts" naming classes are in exported packages, renaming them will cause major version bump. I just want to confirm we are willing to pay the major version bump price to get rid of the struts footprints, right?
CC @mhan810