-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LPS-96625 Not needed #74419
LPS-96625 Not needed #74419
Conversation
This is to hide the configuration pages when auto tagging is disabled.
CI is automatically triggering "ci:test:sf" and "ci:test:relevant" for this pull to run Source Formatter and relevant tests. Comment "ci:test" to run the full PR Tester for this pull. |
✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 3 minutes 33 seconds 18 msClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: pr-277 1 Successful Jobs:For more details click here. |
Just started reviewing :) |
Merged. Thank you. |
Merged and pushed upstream.. @4lejandrito there sure is a lot of duplicate code in here? I wish we could more easily add this to each module without duplicating so much code. @JorgeFerrer do you mind taking a quick look at how we're doing auto tagging? something seems off. |
Sure.
@4lejandrito <https://github.com/4lejandrito> let's look at this together
on Monday
…Sent from my phone
El mié., 12 jun. 2019 22:57, Brian Chan <notifications@github.com> escribió:
Merged and pushed upstream..
@4lejandrito <https://github.com/4lejandrito> there sure is a lot of
duplicate code in here? I wish we could more easily add this to each module
without duplicating so much code.
@JorgeFerrer <https://github.com/JorgeFerrer> do you mind taking a quick
look at how we're doing auto tagging? something seems off.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#74419?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAGT5QCRQND32PD32W7V3EDP2FPLNA5CNFSM4HXJALVKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXRY55I#issuecomment-501452533>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGT5QDDIJBQ5RY55SXVXR3P2FPLNANCNFSM4HXJALVA>
.
|
Hey @brianchandotcom , How do we solve this? We need to change the implementation a bit so that we avoid having to create a class for each point in the matrix. We started writing the solution and have it almost working. The keys are:
We can then have code in one single place which creates all the combination of the two. We still have one pending challenge though: the configuration. We are currently providing users with an option to enable or disable all possible combinations of the matrix and we want to continue providing that option. To do that, we need to do some improvements to the configuration framework so that it can be more dynamic and show all available options without needing a specific Configuration interface for them. We believe this shouldn't be too hard and Alejandro is going to do some research to find out how to do it. Makes sense? |
No description provided.