Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LPS-100019 In case workflow definition doesn't exist, we have to continue with following StagedGroupedWorkflowDefinitionLink entry #77205

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

inacionery
Copy link

No description provided.

…inue with following StagedGroupedWorkflowDefinitionLink entry
@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

CI is automatically triggering "ci:test:sf" and "ci:test:relevant" for this pull to run Source Formatter and relevant tests.

Comment "ci:test" to run the full PR Tester for this pull.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 2 minutes 28 seconds 31 ms

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 287924fd3ba1e2086b763f76da0b2308c52184f1

Sender Branch:

Branch Name: pr-206
Branch GIT ID: e89d467f3923e8322d15abe7c06744a0b16cae49

1 out of 1jobs PASSED
1 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 2 minutes 47 seconds 705 ms

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 287924fd3ba1e2086b763f76da0b2308c52184f1

Sender Branch:

Branch Name: pr-206
Branch GIT ID: e89d467f3923e8322d15abe7c06744a0b16cae49

1 out of 1jobs PASSED
1 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ ci:test:relevant - 15 out of 18 jobs passed in 1 hour 59 seconds 743 ms

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 479600eade1c9ce1049866063ee2a4cedaf3b9a5

Copied in Private Modules Branch:

Branch Name: master-private
Branch GIT ID: 42deb1ab72c18d4cf1f7d745ca3315dbb1c8a5ee

15 out of 18 jobs PASSED
15 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

Failures unique to this pull:


Failures in common with acceptance upstream results at 479600e:
  1. test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest-batch(master)/semantic-versioning-jdk8
    Job Results:

    0 Tests Passed.
    1 Test Failed.

    1. AXIS_VARIABLE=0,label_exp=!master #72365

      Please fix semantic versioning on inacionery/pr-206

           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.EventResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.HeaderRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.HeaderResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.PortalPreferencesWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RenderRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RenderResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.ResourceRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.ResourceResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RestrictPortletContainerWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.SecurityPortletContainerWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] [Baseline Report] Mode: diff (persisted)
           [exec] Semantic versioning is incorrect while checking /opt/dev/projects/github/liferay-portal/portal-impl/portal-impl.jar against /opt/dev/projects/github/liferay-portal/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay.portal/com.liferay.portal.impl/3.44.0/36d473174890064ff84d340f159f110e80f3c3fe/com.liferay.portal.impl-3.44.0.jar

@inacionery
Copy link
Author

ci:test:relevant

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ ci:test:relevant - 16 out of 18 jobs passed in 1 hour 5 minutes 20 seconds 825 ms

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 479600eade1c9ce1049866063ee2a4cedaf3b9a5

Copied in Private Modules Branch:

Branch Name: master-private
Branch GIT ID: 42deb1ab72c18d4cf1f7d745ca3315dbb1c8a5ee

16 out of 18 jobs PASSED
16 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

This pull contains no unique failures.


Failures in common with acceptance upstream results at 479600e:
  1. test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest-batch(master)/semantic-versioning-jdk8
    Job Results:

    0 Tests Passed.
    1 Test Failed.

    1. AXIS_VARIABLE=0,label_exp=!master #185667

      Please fix semantic versioning on inacionery/pr-206

           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.EventResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.HeaderRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.HeaderResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.PortalPreferencesWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RenderRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RenderResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.ResourceRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.ResourceResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RestrictPortletContainerWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.SecurityPortletContainerWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] [Baseline Report] Mode: diff (persisted)
           [exec] Semantic versioning is incorrect while checking /opt/dev/projects/github/liferay-portal/portal-impl/portal-impl.jar against /opt/dev/projects/github/liferay-portal/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay.portal/com.liferay.portal.impl/3.44.0/36d473174890064ff84d340f159f110e80f3c3fe/com.liferay.portal.impl-3.44.0.jar

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ ci:test:relevant - 16 out of 18 jobs passed in 1 hour 16 minutes 53 seconds 313 ms

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 479600eade1c9ce1049866063ee2a4cedaf3b9a5

Copied in Private Modules Branch:

Branch Name: master-private
Branch GIT ID: 42deb1ab72c18d4cf1f7d745ca3315dbb1c8a5ee

16 out of 18 jobs PASSED
16 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

This pull contains no unique failures.


Failures in common with acceptance upstream results at 479600e:
  1. test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest-batch(master)/semantic-versioning-jdk8
    Job Results:

    0 Tests Passed.
    1 Test Failed.

    1. AXIS_VARIABLE=0,label_exp=!master #6095

      Please fix semantic versioning on inacionery/pr-206

           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.EventResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.HeaderRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.HeaderResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.PortalPreferencesWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RenderRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RenderResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.ResourceRequestFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.ResourceResponseFactory
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.RestrictPortletContainerWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] 	~   class      com.liferay.portlet.SecurityPortletContainerWrapper
           [exec] 		-   annotated  aQute.bnd.annotation.ProviderType
           [exec] 		+   annotated  org.osgi.annotation.versioning.ProviderType
           [exec] [Baseline Report] Mode: diff (persisted)
           [exec] Semantic versioning is incorrect while checking /opt/dev/projects/github/liferay-portal/portal-impl/portal-impl.jar against /opt/dev/projects/github/liferay-portal/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.liferay.portal/com.liferay.portal.impl/3.44.0/36d473174890064ff84d340f159f110e80f3c3fe/com.liferay.portal.impl-3.44.0.jar

@brianchandotcom
Copy link
Owner

Merged. Thank you.
View total diff: 3aa5a0c...92d6762

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants