Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding tabix to docker base image #5247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 2, 2018
Merged

Conversation

lbergelson
Copy link
Member

  • including tabix in base image
  • updating base image from 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

* including tabix in base image
* updating base image from 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2
* fixes #5246
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #5247 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              master     #5247   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     86.796%   86.796%           
  Complexity     29779     29779           
===========================================
  Files           1822      1822           
  Lines         137732    137732           
  Branches       15184     15184           
===========================================
  Hits          119546    119546           
  Misses         12665     12665           
  Partials        5521      5521

Copy link
Member

@cwhelan cwhelan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @lbergelson

Looks good! 👍

@lbergelson lbergelson merged commit f556f5f into master Oct 2, 2018
@lbergelson lbergelson deleted the lb_add_tabix_to_base_image branch October 2, 2018 14:32
EdwardDixon pushed a commit to EdwardDixon/gatk that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2018
* including tabix in base image
* updating base image from 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2
* fixes broadinstitute#5246
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants