You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for this wonderful work! I am working on a project which solves a similar problem to UniRes and uses UniRes as a comparison method. However, I think there is something wrong with my code (in creating a low-resolution image or scaling before computing the SSIM metric) that I cannot achieve a similar result in your paper. I would really appreciate it if you could help me check whether anything I did was wrong.
I use the following code to generate a low-resolution image (4mm thick axial sliced) from a high-resolution one ($1\times1\times1 mm^3$):
Then I let UniRes run on the LR_mri.nii.gz to generate a high-resolution one. However, this is the result I get: (Input, UniRes) .
To draw this image, I cropped out an area ($160\times224\times160$) around the brain. I compute the SSIM value on this area after scaling both volumes into [0, 1]. The SSIM I computed is only around 0.48, which is lower than the value reported in the paper.
It also would be really helpful if you could show me the code for how you create low-resolution images.
Thank you for this wonderful project again!
Jueqi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Appologies it took me some time to get back to you on this.
I have now added a demo notebook that shows how to apply the forward model of UniRes to generate a degrated, low-res image and perform reconstructions (i.e., the generation of high-res images):
The notebook visualises results along the way and computes the SSIM between two types of reconstruction: trilinear resampling and super-resolution with the UniRes algorithm. In terms of SSIM, UniRes performs better than trilinear resampling.
I would look at the demo script for generating your low-res images, as this is the model that UniRes assumes for how a low-res image is generated (its 'generative model'). Keep in mind that you might want to set eo_scl = 0 and std_noise = 0 if you simply want to create low-res scans, without additional degradations.
Hi @brudfors ,
Thanks for this wonderful work! I am working on a project which solves a similar problem to UniRes and uses UniRes as a comparison method. However, I think there is something wrong with my code (in creating a low-resolution image or scaling before computing the SSIM metric) that I cannot achieve a similar result in your paper. I would really appreciate it if you could help me check whether anything I did was wrong.
I use the following code to generate a low-resolution image (4mm thick axial sliced) from a high-resolution one ($1\times1\times1 mm^3$ ):
Then I let UniRes run on the LR_mri.nii.gz to generate a high-resolution one. However, this is the result I get: (Input, UniRes)$160\times224\times160$ ) around the brain. I compute the SSIM value on this area after scaling both volumes into [0, 1]. The SSIM I computed is only around 0.48, which is lower than the value reported in the paper.
.
To draw this image, I cropped out an area (
It also would be really helpful if you could show me the code for how you create low-resolution images.
Thank you for this wonderful project again!
Jueqi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: