You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original Issue -
https://code.google.com/p/alageospatialportal/issues/detail?id=972
Project Member Reported by leebel...@gmail.com, May 8, 2012
Hi, all - I've been referring to this myself as "experimental" as I would think
the medium/longer term goal is to be able to, in a more advanced way do the
following:
1) Find sites/plots/survey areas
2) Find the above that have images over time
3) Have a tool that enables comparison of these images over time (perhaps a timeline + ability to select some for side by side viewing) - I'm sure your ideas will be better than mine...
Associated with the above, I assume we'll need new data structures to support
this - including aggregating images from a range of sources (ie: we may get
nicely arranged images from TREND in an area but there will also others) +
allow users to submit a photo of a site rather than a species etc etc...
Jul 11, 2013 Project Member #1 leebel...@gmail.com
Fully agree Peter:
The current Panoramio application in the SP support site-based images but these
are totally unstructured: It is a suite of images taken by anybody at any time
and any location. The minimal data is author, image, date/time, latitude and
longitude. ANY image uploaded to Panoramio IS available in the SP. There is no
search ability in the SP but that would be a terrific idea, if it is possible.
All that can be done currently is zoom/pan to area of interest and after
clicking the 'Panoramio button' (under zoom slider), images will appear.
In principle, it would be a great idea to have a more systematic approach to
site-based images. Mind you, there is nothing stopping anyone from uploading
high-quality, systematic site images to Panoramio, e.g., TERN images!
Cc: moyesyside chris.fl...@gmail.com Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-Medium
Original issue reported on code.google.com by moyesyside on 8 Aug 2013 at 12:12
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
moyesyside
on 8 Aug 2013 at 12:12The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: