[DRAFT] Add verbose flag to codecov #944
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: David Freilich <dfreilich@vmware.com>
dfreilich
force-pushed
the
verbose-codecov
branch
from
4dd36a9
to
c689b67
Compare
Signed-off-by: David Freilich <dfreilich@vmware.com>
dfreilich
force-pushed
the
verbose-codecov
branch
from
c689b67
to
97636e7
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #944 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.55% 76.56% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 103 103
Lines 5005 5007 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 3831 3833 +2
Misses 777 777
Partials 397 397
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: David Freilich dfreilich@vmware.com
This is a draft PR (not an actual draft, in order to run actions and get the codecov result we are trying for), to see whether we can find any more information on our codecov failures using the verbose flag. It was requested on the codecov forums here
Related
Relates to #906