-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Redis error into redis module #346
Conversation
WalkthroughRecent changes in the SDK involve the removal of Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
Note 🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded. Change Summary (click to expand)The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective. Summary: The provided code changes demonstrate a focus on security and robustness within the application's architecture. The removal of the The introduction of the new Redis module in the Files Changed:
These security-focused features demonstrate a strong commitment to maintaining the application's overall security posture. Powered by DryRun Security |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- crates/sdk/src/errors.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/sdk/src/redis.rs (19 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- crates/sdk/src/errors.rs
Additional comments not posted (6)
crates/sdk/src/redis.rs (6)
5-20
: Well-defined error types for Redis operations.The
RedisError
enum is comprehensive and covers a variety of error scenarios that could arise from Redis operations. Good use of descriptive error messages for better debugging.
22-40
: Conversion fromcrate::wit::bulwark::plugin::redis::Error
toRedisError
is correctly implemented.This implementation ensures that errors from the lower-level Redis plugin are correctly converted into the more general
RedisError
, maintaining consistency across error handling.
42-48
: Conversion fromstd::string::FromUtf8Error
toRedisError
is well implemented.This conversion is crucial for handling UTF-8 parsing errors, which are common when dealing with byte streams that represent strings.
50-56
: Conversion fromcrate::ParseCounterError
toRedisError
is correctly implemented.Effective encapsulation of parsing errors into a more general
RedisError
, which simplifies error handling in the calling code.
86-86
: Updated function signatures to useRedisError
.All function signatures have been updated to use
RedisError
instead ofRemoteStateError
. This change aligns with the PR's objective to localize Redis-related errors within the Redis module, improving modularity and clarity in error handling.Also applies to: 99-99, 119-119, 138-138, 153-153, 171-171, 187-187, 202-202, 218-218, 235-235, 249-249, 266-266, 284-284, 298-298, 354-354, 416-416, 476-476, 548-548
548-548
: Ensure proper error handling inparse_i64
.This function parses a byte array into an i64. Verify that all potential errors, such as invalid UTF-8 sequences or non-numeric values, are being handled appropriately.
Verification successful
The
parse_i64
function implementation incrates/sdk/src/redis.rs
is as follows:fn parse_i64(value: Vec<u8>) -> Result<i64, crate::ParseCounterError> { Ok(std::str::from_utf8(value.as_slice())?.parse::<i64>()?) }This function uses the
?
operator to propagate errors fromstd::str::from_utf8
andparse::<i64>
. Both of these operations can fail:from_utf8
can fail if the byte slice is not valid UTF-8, andparse::<i64>
can fail if the string cannot be parsed into ani64
.The
?
operator ensures that any errors from these operations are returned asErr
values of theResult
type, which means the function does handle potential errors correctly.
std::str::from_utf8(value.as_slice())?
will return an error if the byte slice is not valid UTF-8.parse::<i64>()?
will return an error if the string cannot be parsed into ani64
.Thus, the function is handling potential parsing errors appropriately.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `parse_i64` handles all potential parsing errors correctly. # Test: Search for error handling in `parse_i64`. Expect: Proper handling of UTF-8 and parse errors. rg --type rust $'fn parse_i64'Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full implementation of the `parse_i64` function for error handling analysis. # Extract the `parse_i64` function implementation from `crates/sdk/src/redis.rs`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn parse_i64($_) { $$$ }' crates/sdk/src/redis.rsLength of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full implementation of the `parse_i64` function for error handling analysis. # Extract the `parse_i64` function implementation from `crates/sdk/src/redis.rs` with a more specific pattern. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn parse_i64(value: Vec<u8>) -> Result<i64, crate::ParseCounterError> { $$$ }' crates/sdk/src/redis.rsLength of output: 359
Closes #269.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
RedisError
enum for improved error handling in remote state operations.Improvements
RedisError
for better error specificity and handling.