We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
您好,我根据https://github.com/nlpcl-lab/ace2005-preprocessing 的数据进行划分,分数只有72。使用您的划分标准,可以复现出合理的结果。 请问为什么会存在这种差异?您数据集划分的依据是什么? 感谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
我们当时先根据https://github.com/nlpcl-lab/ace2005-preprocessing 的数据进行划分,发现很多已有方法都无法达到预期效果。于是我们意识到可能是数据的具体划分问题,实验中不同划分方式最终的结果的确会有差异。但在随机几次以后仍然很难复现那些方法,就采用了最后一次随机划分作为论文实验的划分。
Sorry, something went wrong.
感谢解答!我们也发现事件检测的很多论文都无法达到预期效果。 很喜欢你们的工作!
No branches or pull requests
您好,我根据https://github.com/nlpcl-lab/ace2005-preprocessing 的数据进行划分,分数只有72。使用您的划分标准,可以复现出合理的结果。
请问为什么会存在这种差异?您数据集划分的依据是什么?
感谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: