MembershipEnumerator.add_user_properties() missing 1 required positional argument: 'fileNamePrefix'

[helloyw]

└─# python3 ADExplorerSnapshot.py result.dat

[] Time of snapshot: 2023-12-04T16:10:54
[] Mapping offset: 0xbffbbc3
[*] Object count: 139228
[+] Parsing properties: 3691
[+] Parsing classes: 543
[+] Parsing object offsets: 139228
[+] Restored pre-processed information from data cache
[◣] Collecting data: 6047/139228 (0 users, 0 groups, 0 computers, 35 certtemplates, 3 CAs, 0 trusts)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/kali/desktop/ADExplorerSnapshot.py/ADExplorerSnapshot.py", line 2, in
adexpsnapshot.main()
File "/home/kali/desktop/ADExplorerSnapshot.py/adexpsnapshot/init.py", line 1129, in main
ades.outputBloodHound()
File "/home/kali/desktop/ADExplorerSnapshot.py/adexpsnapshot/init.py", line 137, in outputBloodHound
self.process()
File "/home/kali/desktop/ADExplorerSnapshot.py/adexpsnapshot/init.py", line 265, in process
ret = fun(obj)
^^^^^^^^
File "/home/kali/desktop/ADExplorerSnapshot.py/adexpsnapshot/init.py", line 744, in processUsers
MembershipEnumerator.add_user_properties(user, entry)
TypeError: MembershipEnumerator.add_user_properties() missing 1 required positional argument: 'fileNamePrefix'

[michiiii]

I am running into the exact same error.

[michiiii]

found a quickfix, it seems to be related to the new version of bloodhound.py.

You can edit setup.py and change the bloodhound >= sign to ==

Credits for this to skelsec

[helloyw]

found a quickfix, it seems to be related to the new version of bloodhound.py.

You can edit setup.py and change the bloodhound >= sign to ==

Credits for this to skelsec

Thank you for your answer, which helped me solve this problem

[caroline7714]

hi
I have a similar error to what is displayed below.

#38 (comment)

Have you thought about it at all?

[DrorDvash]

found a quickfix, it seems to be related to the new version of bloodhound.py.

You can edit setup.py and change the bloodhound >= sign to ==

Credits for this to skelsec

worked for me also!! thank you!
but csc and tpls is invalid(NaN%), someone know why?