You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A user of cadCAD, @rogervs, recently commented on the fact that run == subset + 1. This doesn't make much sense, as it doesn't provide useful additional info, instead there should be a hierarchy from simulation to subset to run to timestep, where the maximum of the former should never be larger than the maximum of the latter.
Illustrative example: an A/B test of 3 simulations, each with a parameter sweep of 3 parameter sets, 3 Monte Carlo runs, and 100 timesteps.
It should have a hierarchy of a simulation per config that’s simulated, subset per parameter set in the sweep for each simulation, and a run per Monte Carlo run for each subset.
In total, we'd expect 333 or 27 sets of data of 100 timesteps each.
This is probably just a bug or oversight?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A user of cadCAD, @rogervs, recently commented on the fact that
run == subset + 1
. This doesn't make much sense, as it doesn't provide useful additional info, instead there should be a hierarchy fromsimulation
tosubset
torun
totimestep
, where the maximum of the former should never be larger than the maximum of the latter.Illustrative example: an A/B test of 3 simulations, each with a parameter sweep of 3 parameter sets, 3 Monte Carlo runs, and 100 timesteps.
It should have a hierarchy of a
simulation
per config that’s simulated,subset
per parameter set in the sweep for eachsimulation
, and arun
per Monte Carlo run for eachsubset
.In total, we'd expect 333 or 27 sets of data of 100 timesteps each.
This is probably just a bug or oversight?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: