You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unfortunately there are times where you need tls_insecure_skip_verify in production, like reverse proxying to old, outdated devices, with awfully wrong self-signed certificates that might be expired and never updated.
I propose an option for pinning fixed certificates to such endpoints, like a PR #6329 that I use in my own setup.
First, we get SHA256 fingerprint of the certificate: openssl x509 -in .lnd/tls.cert -noout -fingerprint -sha256
Then we add a directive alongside tls_insecure_skip_verify: tls_server_cert_sha256 "07:E9:E5:E8:50:54:26:CE:7D:37:A4:4F:71:15:0B:3A:53:B3:65:A6:9E:B8:D9:20:93:54:94:16:2D:48:23:01"
Now our security exception doesn't allow an easy MITM attack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unfortunately there are times where you need
tls_insecure_skip_verify
in production, like reverse proxying to old, outdated devices, with awfully wrong self-signed certificates that might be expired and never updated.I propose an option for pinning fixed certificates to such endpoints, like a PR #6329 that I use in my own setup.
First, we get SHA256 fingerprint of the certificate:
openssl x509 -in .lnd/tls.cert -noout -fingerprint -sha256
Then we add a directive alongside
tls_insecure_skip_verify
:tls_server_cert_sha256 "07:E9:E5:E8:50:54:26:CE:7D:37:A4:4F:71:15:0B:3A:53:B3:65:A6:9E:B8:D9:20:93:54:94:16:2D:48:23:01"
Now our security exception doesn't allow an easy MITM attack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: