Add Yaci DevKit into builder tools

[fill-the-fill]

Checklist

• I have read the How to Contribute.
• I have read the Builder Tool Requirements
• I have run yarn build after adding my changes without getting any errors.

Builder Tool addition

• Title: Yaci DevKit
• Description: Create your own local Cardano devnet with ease! It includes an Indexer, minimal Explorer interface, and support for Cardano Client Lib or Lucid JS library's Blockfrost provider.
• Website: Yaci DevKit
• Getstarted: null
• Tags:
  • cli
  • testing

[rphair]

Looks like a really good thing 🤓

I wonder about the best criteria for scaling these logos into the image box. Currently this one is rather small compared to the frame & could be increased a bit. But also would be good if it's "magnified" no more than other logos... yet I think making the logos larger on solid colour backgrounds would provide more clarity for the projects & presentation quality for the Portal pages.

@fill-the-fill you are scaling these according to your own impressions & know well how the logos all look in groups, so what are your feelings are about this? 🤔

[fill-the-fill]

Looks like a really good thing 🤓

I wonder about the best criterial for scaling these logos into the image box. Currently it's rather small compared to the frame & could be increased a bit. But also would be good if it's "magnified" no more than other logos... yet I think making the logos larger on solid colour backgrounds would provide more clarity for the projects & presentation quality for the Portal pages.

@fill-the-fill you are scaling these according to your own impressions & know well how the logos all look in groups, so what are your feelings are about this? 🤔

I've scaled the logo for it to fit in the preview image. Since I didn't find any other picture that represents the project I used this one and scaled a bit. But I'm more than open for changes 😊

[rphair]

IMHO we should MAKE ALL THE THINGS BIGGER 😂 unless there is some typographic usefulness for the white space surrounding web site features 🤓

[fill-the-fill]

IMHO we should MAKE ALL THE THINGS BIGGER 😂 unless there is some typographic usefulness for the white space surrounding web site features 🤓

I could look into that and spend some time adjusting other logos. Maybe you could open an issue (suggestion) and I will take into my hands =)

[rphair]

sure, I'll have a look next time browsing the listings. There were 1 or 2 contributions where the logo was too small (this is not one of them), or detail in a screenshot was illegible (and therefore also needed to be "zoomed in" somehow), and in my experience we've addressed them in the PRs. If I observe a potential improvement I'll open an issue and maybe GIMP them myself. 😎