Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed #489

theomota · 2022-07-06T19:08:03Z

Description
I was not able to use the Paparazzi in my projects. I'm always getting the same error, it seems like Paparazzi is crashing during the rendering of my Composables. I've tried different types of combinations changing CompileSDK and lib version, but I'm always getting the same error.

Steps to Reproduce

Using compose version 1.1.1 and testing a simple button.

class PaparazziLinkButtonTest {
    @get:Rule
    val paparazzi = Paparazzi()

    @Test
    fun TestingSnap() {
        paparazzi.snapshot(name = "simpleLinkButton") {
            LinkButton(
                text = "Testing Paparazzi",
                onClick = {}
            )
        }
    }
}

It fails when I try to run the test with the message SEVERE: broken: Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed

Additional information:

Paparazzi Version: 1.0.0
OS: OS: MacOS 12.4.0
Compile SDK: 31
Gradle Version: 7.3.3
Android Gradle Plugin Version: 7.2.1
Compose version: 1.1.1

Log

Jul 06, 2022 4:00:48 PM app.cash.paparazzi.internal.PaparazziLogger error
SEVERE: broken: Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed
com.android.layoutlib.common.util.ReflectionUtils$ReflectionException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
	at com.android.layoutlib.common.util.ReflectionUtils.invoke(ReflectionUtils.java:84)
	at com.android.layoutlib.common.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeStatic(ReflectionUtils.java:92)
	at com.android.layoutlib.bridge.Bridge.init(Bridge.java:239)
	at app.cash.paparazzi.internal.Renderer.prepare(Renderer.kt:84)
	at app.cash.paparazzi.Paparazzi.prepare(Paparazzi.kt:158)
	at app.cash.paparazzi.Paparazzi$apply$statement$1.evaluate(Paparazzi.kt:122)
	at app.cash.paparazzi.agent.AgentTestRule$apply$1.evaluate(AgentTestRule.kt:17)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.runTestClass(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:110)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:58)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:38)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.java:62)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.SuiteTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(SuiteTestClassProcessor.java:51)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:36)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ContextClassLoaderDispatch.dispatch(ContextClassLoaderDispatch.java:33)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:94)
	at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy2.processTestClass(Unknown Source)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker$2.run(TestWorker.java:176)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.executeAndMaintainThreadName(TestWorker.java:129)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:100)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:60)
	at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.ActionExecutionWorker.execute(ActionExecutionWorker.java:56)
	at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:133)
	at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:71)
	at worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.run(GradleWorkerMain.java:69)
	at worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.main(GradleWorkerMain.java:74)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at com.android.layoutlib.common.util.ReflectionUtils.invoke(ReflectionUtils.java:80)
	... 41 more
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'java.lang.String android.text.TextUtils.join(java.lang.CharSequence, java.lang.Object[])'
	at android.graphics.fonts.FontVariationAxis.toFontVariationSettings(FontVariationAxis.java:190)
	at android.graphics.FontListParser.readFont(FontListParser.java:269)
	at android.graphics.FontListParser.readFamily(FontListParser.java:191)
	at android.graphics.FontListParser.readFamilies(FontListParser.java:143)
	at android.graphics.FontListParser.parse(FontListParser.java:118)
	at android.graphics.fonts.SystemFonts.getSystemFontConfigInternal_Original(SystemFonts.java:244)
	at android.graphics.fonts.SystemFonts_Delegate.getSystemFontConfigInternal(SystemFonts_Delegate.java:65)
	at android.graphics.fonts.SystemFonts.getSystemFontConfigInternal(SystemFonts.java:244)
	at android.graphics.fonts.SystemFonts.getSystemPreinstalledFontConfig(SystemFonts.java:230)
	at android.graphics.Typeface.deferredStaticInitializer(Typeface.java:1395)
	... 46 more


Failed to init Bridge.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to init Bridge.
	at app.cash.paparazzi.internal.Renderer.prepare(Renderer.kt:83)
	at app.cash.paparazzi.Paparazzi.prepare(Paparazzi.kt:158)
	at app.cash.paparazzi.Paparazzi$apply$statement$1.evaluate(Paparazzi.kt:122)
	at app.cash.paparazzi.agent.AgentTestRule$apply$1.evaluate(AgentTestRule.kt:17)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.runTestClass(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:110)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:58)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:38)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.java:62)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.SuiteTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(SuiteTestClassProcessor.java:51)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:36)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ContextClassLoaderDispatch.dispatch(ContextClassLoaderDispatch.java:33)
	at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:94)
	at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy2.processTestClass(Unknown Source)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker$2.run(TestWorker.java:176)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.executeAndMaintainThreadName(TestWorker.java:129)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:100)
	at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:60)
	at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.ActionExecutionWorker.execute(ActionExecutionWorker.java:56)
	at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:133)
	at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:71)
	at worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.run(GradleWorkerMain.java:69)
	at worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.main(GradleWorkerMain.java:74)

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

theomota · 2022-07-06T20:32:34Z

I was able to make it work by isolating the paparazzi tests in a new module. Is that required?

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-06T23:49:54Z

@theomota Can you clarify what you meant about a new module? I just created an Android library module, added paparazzi to it, and I'm seeing this exact same issue.

theomota · 2022-07-07T13:42:52Z

@AdamMc331 Sure, let me try to explain what happened step-by-step.

In the project that I'm currently working on we have a module (android lib) with Composables. In this module, we have regular Snapshot tests for every component (by regular I mean androidTest).
I tried to add paparazzi in this module with the intent to migrate all our screenshot tests to paparazzi. I tried everything with no luck.... Always the same error Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed.
After that, I create a new module (Snapshot-tests) and added the Paparazzi plugin to it.. and it worked. I have no idea why, It has the same versions as the old module and it also has the old module as a dependency. So I can really explain why it works.

I hope that helps

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-07T14:19:00Z

Hmm okay. I will give this a try, too!

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-07T14:53:19Z

@theomota Any chance you can share the build.gradle file of your snapshots-tests module? What does the compose config look like within that module?

theomota · 2022-07-07T14:56:12Z

Sure, but it's a pretty regular gradle file.

plugins {
    id 'com.android.library'
    id 'org.jetbrains.kotlin.android'
    id 'app.cash.paparazzi'
}

android {
    compileSdk 31

    defaultConfig {
        minSdk 27
        targetSdk 31

        testInstrumentationRunner "androidx.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner"
        consumerProguardFiles "consumer-rules.pro"
    }

    buildTypes {
        release {
            minifyEnabled false
            proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android-optimize.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
        }
    }
    compileOptions {
        sourceCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_1_8
        targetCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_1_8
    }
    kotlinOptions {
        jvmTarget = '1.8'
    }
    buildFeatures {
        compose = true
    }
    composeOptions {
        kotlinCompilerExtensionVersion versions.composeCompiler
    }
}

dependencies {
    implementation project(":ComposeLib")
    testImplementation 'junit:junit:4.13.2'
}

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-07T14:57:19Z

Hmm, well I was still getting the same issue after all. I guess we'll see if one of the maintainers can weigh in in a bit. I'll try to make a reproducible repo that has less fluff.

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-07T15:07:11Z

Well, this whole plan backfired. I created a brand new project, and the android-components module of this project was able to run the recordPaparazziDebug task without any issues.

https://github.com/AdamMc331/PaparazziComposeSample

I guess I'll try to do some comparisons to see if I can figure out what makes this project different from my other one.

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-07T16:45:13Z

Yep I'm stumped, it's not a minimal reproducible project but here is my setup: AdamMc331/TOA#146

theomota · 2022-07-07T19:38:23Z

@AdamMc331 You should also try the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT version.

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-07T19:46:39Z

Same issue. :(

luis-cortes · 2022-07-08T15:43:10Z

@theomota Can you provide a minimal reproduction sample? Is your project also KMM?

@AdamMc331 I tried to open your project in AS, but was unable to get it to sync. That said, running from the command line yields a different stack trace than what's posted above.

AdamMc331 · 2022-07-08T16:16:43Z

Hmm, I wonder if KMM is the issue, though if it's specifically within an Android lib module I'm not sure why that would be the case.

theomota · 2022-07-12T18:40:30Z

Sorry, I was not able to create a reproduction sample.
I'll try again during the weekend.

handstandsam · 2022-07-14T14:43:08Z

I'm seeing the Failed to init Bridge issue as well after bumping compileSdk 32 -> 33 globally. When I set the compileSdk back to 32 for this specific module, it fixes it. Unfortunately I can't share this code as a repro case.

jrodbx · 2022-07-26T16:00:38Z

I'm seeing the Failed to init Bridge issue as well after bumping compileSdk 32 -> 33 globally. When I set the compileSdk back to 32 for this specific module, it fixes it. Unfortunately I can't share this code as a repro case.

Paparazzi (read: layoutlib) doesn't support compileSdk 33 at the moment.

Hmm, I wonder if KMM is the issue, though if it's specifically within an Android lib module I'm not sure why that would be the case.

This would be a helpful scenario to confirm/eliminate. Can you try and relay your results?

jrodbx · 2022-07-26T16:01:49Z

For the compileSdk 32 issue, you can backport Paparazzi to use earlier platform versions in snapshot tests, like so:

    environment = detectEnvironment().copy(
      platformDir = "${androidHome()}/platforms/android-32",
      compileSdkVersion = 32
    ),

jrodbx · 2022-07-29T04:29:31Z

@theomota any luck on obtaining a sample repro?

jrodbx · 2022-08-08T05:38:48Z

Closing due to lack of activity. Please re-file with sample repro.

rharter · 2022-08-30T16:19:58Z

For the compileSdk 32 issue, you can backport Paparazzi to use earlier platform versions in snapshot tests, like so:
    environment = detectEnvironment().copy(
      platformDir = "${androidHome()}/platforms/android-32",
      compileSdkVersion = 32
    ),

Any reason this can't be part of the upstream detectEnvironment()? i.e. use the latest supported platform if the detected one is greater than it?

BMeloCarvalho · 2022-09-23T18:52:21Z

Paparazzi (read: layoutlib) doesn't support compileSdk 33 at the moment.

Is there any idea if this support will be released soon?

XabierGoros · 2022-11-30T21:08:26Z

In my case I was getting the same error no matter the version of the Paparazzi library I was using. My first quick thought was it had something to do with the Apple Silicon architecture like some other cases with other libraries, however it hasn't.

Since I successfully achieved to run the sample project provided here. I just tried to find the 7 differences between this project and my personal one. After simplifying it to the maximum, it turns out that applying the JetBrains Kover gradle plugin for code coverage caused the Bridge error. Commenting out that plugin, everything worked as expected (applying the compileSdkVersion workaround in the environment since I use target 33). I don't exactly know how the plugin affects to the Bridge, however, at least from my experience it seems some gradle plugins may be part of the cause.

AdamMc331 mentioned this issue Jul 7, 2022

Adding component module with Paparazzi tests. AdamMc331/TOA#146

Closed

eboudrant mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2022

lateinit property sessionParamsBuilder has not been initialized when using compileSdk 33 #486

Closed

jrodbx added the waiting on user Waiting on information from OP label Aug 1, 2022

jrodbx closed this as completed Aug 8, 2022

ember-rose mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2022

Layoutlib crash on API 33 #558

Closed

sobaya-0141 mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2022

Add preview test DroidKaigi/conference-app-2022#97

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed #489

Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed #489

theomota commented Jul 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

theomota commented Jul 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

AdamMc331 commented Jul 6, 2022

theomota commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

theomota commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

theomota commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

luis-cortes commented Jul 8, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 8, 2022

theomota commented Jul 12, 2022

handstandsam commented Jul 14, 2022

jrodbx commented Jul 26, 2022

jrodbx commented Jul 26, 2022

jrodbx commented Jul 29, 2022

jrodbx commented Aug 8, 2022

rharter commented Aug 30, 2022

BMeloCarvalho commented Sep 23, 2022

XabierGoros commented Nov 30, 2022

Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed #489

Layoutlib Bridge initialization failed #489

Comments

theomota commented Jul 6, 2022 • edited Loading

theomota commented Jul 6, 2022 • edited Loading

AdamMc331 commented Jul 6, 2022

theomota commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

theomota commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

theomota commented Jul 7, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 7, 2022

luis-cortes commented Jul 8, 2022

AdamMc331 commented Jul 8, 2022

theomota commented Jul 12, 2022

handstandsam commented Jul 14, 2022

jrodbx commented Jul 26, 2022

jrodbx commented Jul 26, 2022

jrodbx commented Jul 29, 2022

jrodbx commented Aug 8, 2022

rharter commented Aug 30, 2022

BMeloCarvalho commented Sep 23, 2022

XabierGoros commented Nov 30, 2022

theomota commented Jul 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

theomota commented Jul 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading