-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix NoSuchFieldError in newer Kotlin plugins #3422
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ internal class SqlDelightReferenceContributor : PsiReferenceContributor() { | |
val scope = module.getModuleWithDependenciesAndLibrariesScope(false) | ||
val classNameIndex = KotlinFullClassNameIndex.getInstance() | ||
val ktClass = { classNameIndex[qName, project, scope].firstOrNull() } | ||
val typeAliasFqNameIndex = KotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex.getInstance() | ||
val typeAliasFqNameIndex = getKotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex() | ||
val typeAlias = { typeAliasFqNameIndex[qName, project, scope].firstOrNull() } | ||
val javaPsiFacade = JavaPsiFacade.getInstance(project) | ||
val javaClass = { javaPsiFacade.findClass(qName, scope) } | ||
|
@@ -74,3 +74,17 @@ internal class SqlDelightReferenceContributor : PsiReferenceContributor() { | |
private fun typeForThisPackage(file: SqlDelightFile) = "${file.packageName}.${element.text}" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private fun getKotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex(): KotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex { | ||
// read the INSTANCE variable reflectively first (newer Kotlin plugins) | ||
try { | ||
val instanceField = KotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex::class.java.getField("INSTANCE") | ||
val instance = instanceField.get(null) | ||
if (instance is KotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex) { | ||
return instance | ||
} | ||
} catch (e: Exception) { | ||
/* intentionally empty, fall back to getInstance() call in case of errors */ | ||
} | ||
return KotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex.getInstance() | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. And then this could be moved into the |
||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should not we throw an exception in the else block in case
instance
is of any type other thanKotlinTopLevelTypeAliasFqNameIndex
? So if in the future it breaks again, we at least get a proper stacktraceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, I think that case overall is highly unlikely:
<T>.INSTANCE
static field exists but is not of typeT
.I guess to make it safer we could reflectively check for
Companion
+getInstance
method though and then throw if neitherINSTANCE
field nor$Companion.getInstance
is present?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough!