You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I haven't been able to reproduce the performance figures that are listed in the README.
I used Intel i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge from 2011) running at 3.29 GHz (Turbo disabled), Windows 10 and binaries built with Visual Studio 2019 in x64 Release configuration.
Snowshoe Unit Tester: EC Scalar Multiplication
RDTSC instruction runs at 3.29252 GHz
+ ec_elligator: `33772` median cycles, `10.3136` avg usec
+ ec_mul_gen: `114412` median cycles, `34.8923` avg usec
+ ec_mul: `337620` median cycles, `102.747` avg usec
+ ec_simul_gen: `389280` median cycles, `118.303` avg usec
+ ec_simul: `469072` median cycles, `142.706` avg usec
This is 2-2.5 times slower than the presented cycle counts for Sandy Bridge. Any explanation for this discrepancy? Are some optimizations not enabled for Windows/MSVC?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I haven't been able to reproduce the performance figures that are listed in the README.
I used Intel i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge from 2011) running at 3.29 GHz (Turbo disabled), Windows 10 and binaries built with Visual Studio 2019 in x64 Release configuration.
This is 2-2.5 times slower than the presented cycle counts for Sandy Bridge. Any explanation for this discrepancy? Are some optimizations not enabled for Windows/MSVC?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: