Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] fixed missing std:: for vector #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2014
Merged

Conversation

aiche
Copy link

@aiche aiche commented Feb 13, 2014

  • also applied uncrustify

 * also applied uncrustify
cbielow added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2014
[FIX] fixed missing std:: for vector
@cbielow cbielow merged commit cecb4a0 into cbielow:MGF_fix2 Feb 13, 2014
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2014
Improved intensity profile computation
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2014
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2015
…EAK)

9. leaked_storage: Variable fp going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2015
…_FREE)

74. pass_freed_arg: Passing freed pointer prediction_data as an argument to getSVCProbabilities - was no real problem, coverity was mislead by scope-only usage variable being declared in main scope
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2015
…able (UNINIT)

5. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value bin->mean_ when calling BackgroundIntensityBin. added init of mean_ as its accessed by the copy constructor. If we want not to pay for something unless we explicitly ask for it, we have to deal with mean_ differently.
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2015
…CTOR_DTOR_LEAK)

16. alloc_new: Allocating memory by calling new OpenMS::SuffixArraySeqan::TIter(this->index_).
17. var_assign: Assigning: this->it_ = new OpenMS::SuffixArraySeqan::TIter(this->index_).
18. ctor_dtor_leak: The constructor allocates field it_ of OpenMS::SuffixArraySeqan but the destructor and whatever functions it calls do not free it.
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2018
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2018
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2019
cbielow added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2019
"
! Undefined control sequence.
\DoxyCode ...}{0ex plus 0ex minus 0ex}\ifthenelse
                                                  {\equal {#1}{0}} { {\lccod...
l.411 \begin{DoxyCodeInclude}{0}
"
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
* Code Arrangement Changes #7 (OpenMS#5471)

* Code Arrangement Changes #7

* Update ClusterAnalyzer.cpp

Co-authored-by: Arraxx <kumaramanjha2901@gmail.com>

* Added wrap-doc methods #10 (OpenMS#5467)

* Added wrap-doc methods #10

* Added wrap-doc methods #7 (OpenMS#5445)

* Wrap-doc methods added #7

* Added wrap-doc methods #11 (OpenMS#5468)

* Added wrap-doc methods #11

* Added wrap-doc methods #9 (OpenMS#5465)

* Added wrap-doc methods #9

* minor fixes (OpenMS#5474)

* Adding Wrap Doc Method (OpenMS#5389)

* add wrap doc #1

* Added wrap-doc methods #8 (OpenMS#5459)

* Added wrap-doc methods #8

* Code Arrangement Changes #8 (OpenMS#5476)

Co-authored-by: Arraxx <kumaramanjha2901@gmail.com>

* fix bug in featureXML schema

* fix bug in 1.8 schema

Co-authored-by: Samuel Wein <sam@samwein.com>
Co-authored-by: Aman Kumar <54955755+Arraxx@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Arraxx <kumaramanjha2901@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rahul Agrawal <41531498+rahul799@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Alka <randalthor89@gmx.net>
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2021
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2022
cbielow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants