-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support clients configuration with external Ceph clusters #1670
Comments
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool (eg. TripleO). This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool (eg. TripleO). This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool (eg. TripleO). This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool (eg. TripleO). This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool (eg. TripleO). This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Fixed in 0032640 |
@leseb s/fixed/going to be fixed/ to be more precise |
That commit is not yet in master |
@leseb Would you please tell me if you plan to include this in the 2.3 release? |
Merged
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool (eg. TripleO). This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool (eg. TripleO). This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2017
This commit add the possibility to deploy a standalone client node for external ceph-cluster that is managed by an other deployment tool. This is related to BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 10, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
guits
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 11, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
leseb
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
andrewschoen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 23, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
leseb
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 24, 2017
This will give us more flexibility and the possibility to deploy a client node for an external ceph-cluster. related BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469426 Fixes: #1670 Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@redhat.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It is important for the integration in TripleO that we allow for configuration of the clients without configuring other roles.
In this scenario the list of mons and the fsid will be given by the user as input and, together with keys:, should make it possible to configure a client without requiring access to the mons role.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: