Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Fix typos in placement-groups.rst #17973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 28, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions doc/rados/operations/placement-groups.rst
Expand Up @@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ permanent data loss in a single placement group:

- The OSD fails and all copies of the object it contains are lost.
For all objects within the placement group the number of replica
suddently drops from three to two.
suddenly drops from three to two.

- Ceph starts recovery for this placement group by chosing a new OSD
- Ceph starts recovery for this placement group by choosing a new OSD
to re-create the third copy of all objects.

- Another OSD, within the same placement group, fails before the new
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ placement group, the ratio between the number of placement groups and
the number of OSDs may influence the distribution of the data
significantly.

For instance, if there was single a placement group for ten OSDs in a
For instance, if there was a single placement group for ten OSDs in a
three replica pool, only three OSD would be used because CRUSH would
have no other choice. When more placement groups are available,
objects are more likely to be evenly spread among them. CRUSH also
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ Choosing the number of Placement Groups

If you have more than 50 OSDs, we recommend approximately 50-100
placement groups per OSD to balance out resource usage, data
durability and distribution. If you have less than 50 OSDs, chosing
durability and distribution. If you have less than 50 OSDs, choosing
among the `preselection`_ above is best. For a single pool of objects,
you can use the following formula to get a baseline::

Expand Down