Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mon: A PG with PG_STATE_REPAIR doesn't mean damaged data, PG_STATE_IN… #26178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2019

Conversation

dzafman
Copy link
Contributor

@dzafman dzafman commented Jan 28, 2019

…CONSISTENT does

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/38070

Signed-off-by: David Zafman dzafman@redhat.com

  • References tracker ticket
  • Updates documentation if necessary
  • Includes tests for new functionality or reproducer for bug

…CONSISTENT does

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/38070

Signed-off-by: David Zafman <dzafman@redhat.com>
@dzafman
Copy link
Contributor Author

dzafman commented Feb 5, 2019

Testing passed
same as rados run described in #26213

@dzafman dzafman merged commit f289816 into ceph:master Feb 5, 2019
@dzafman dzafman deleted the wip-38070 branch February 5, 2019 22:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants