Wip rgw swift expiration #5692
Merged
Wip rgw swift expiration #5692
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4096 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
Fixes: #4099 Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com> Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com> Conflicts: src/rgw/rgw_op.cc
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
Give a more clear name Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
$ radosgw-admin objects expire Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
minor issues following code review Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
to prevent multiple rgws processing the same shard concurrently Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
This was referenced Aug 28, 2015
|
@rzarzynski can you take a look at my changes here? Thanks! |
And potentially later we could use also the S3 api, so it could work with multipart upload, and POST obj. Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
Not by time. This should provide better concurrency. Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
yehudasa
force-pushed
the
wip-rgw-swift-expiration
branch
from
7018cef
to
3626db4
Compare
We don't want to keep the expiration value of a copied object, unless we're doing a copy within the same zone group. Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
|
@rzarzynski can you take a look at the last commit? |
|
@yehudasa it looks good! |
yehudasa
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2015
Wip rgw swift expiration Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com> Reviewed-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Support for swift object expiration