Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

task/packages: install libcephfs1-dev #907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2016
Merged

task/packages: install libcephfs1-dev #907

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2016

Conversation

jcsp
Copy link
Contributor

@jcsp jcsp commented Jul 13, 2016

The way we currently build the cephfs java
bindings depends on the unversioned .so file
which is in the -dev package, not the
main one.

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16640
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.spray@redhat.com

The way we currently build the cephfs java
bindings depends on the unversioned .so file
which is in the -dev package, not the
main one.

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16640
Signed-off-by: John Spray <john.spray@redhat.com>
@zmc zmc merged commit 3807f28 into master Jul 13, 2016
@zmc zmc deleted the wip-16640 branch July 13, 2016 15:10
@jcsp jcsp restored the wip-16640 branch July 13, 2016 15:11
@ktdreyer ktdreyer deleted the wip-16640 branch July 14, 2016 15:54
@ktdreyer
Copy link
Member

@jcsp are we covering up a packaging bug with this change?

@jcsp
Copy link
Contributor Author

jcsp commented Jul 14, 2016

@ktdreyer I prefer "working around", but yes :-) -- as you say on the ticket, the solution is probably to persuade the JNI lib to link differently

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants