Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bridge: remove all supervisor.SignalHealthy calls #64

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

leoluk
Copy link
Contributor

@leoluk leoluk commented Oct 28, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

Supervisor does not back off tasks that failed in a healthy state.

There are a couple places where we rely on supervisor for
application-level backoff, so we always want back-off. The distinction
is meant to enable runnables to implement their own specific back-off
logic, which we don't, so we can safely ignore it.

Fixes #37

Supervisor does not back off tasks that failed in a healthy state.

There are a couple places where we rely on supervisor for
application-level backoff, so we always want back-off. The distinction
is meant to enable runnables to implement their own specific back-off
logic, which we don't, so we can safely ignore it.

Fixes #37

[ghstack-poisoned]
Leo added 2 commits October 28, 2020 19:47
Supervisor does not back off tasks that failed in a healthy state.

There are a couple places where we rely on supervisor for
application-level backoff, so we always want back-off. The distinction
is meant to enable runnables to implement their own specific back-off
logic, which we don't, so we can safely ignore it.

Fixes #37

[ghstack-poisoned]
Supervisor does not back off tasks that failed in a healthy state.

There are a couple places where we rely on supervisor for
application-level backoff, so we always want back-off. The distinction
is meant to enable runnables to implement their own specific back-off
logic, which we don't, so we can safely ignore it.

Fixes #37

[ghstack-poisoned]
Supervisor does not back off tasks that failed in a healthy state.

There are a couple places where we rely on supervisor for
application-level backoff, so we always want back-off. The distinction
is meant to enable runnables to implement their own specific back-off
logic, which we don't, so we can safely ignore it.

Fixes #37

[ghstack-poisoned]
Supervisor does not back off tasks that failed in a healthy state.

There are a couple places where we rely on supervisor for
application-level backoff, so we always want back-off. The distinction
is meant to enable runnables to implement their own specific back-off
logic, which we don't, so we can safely ignore it.

Fixes #37

[ghstack-poisoned]
@leoluk leoluk closed this in fd27570 Oct 28, 2020
@leoluk leoluk deleted the gh/leoluk/19/head branch November 16, 2020 21:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants