You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The public API of the DataAssimilationBenchmarks.jl module is currently documented in the README.md. This clutters the document and does not adhere to a standardized documentation formatting.
Julia enables object documentation via docstrings, and advertises a standard to write such documentations. This has the advantage that the documentation is part of the actual source code, and that a formatted documentation can always be generated from the source code with Documenter.jl.
Please consider removing the API documentation from the README.md, and adding appropriate docstrings to the functions of the module that are part of the public API. I think this would work well together with my suggestion in #7, thus making the README.md a more "high-level" overview of the package.
The public API of the
DataAssimilationBenchmarks.jl
module is currently documented in theREADME.md
. This clutters the document and does not adhere to a standardized documentation formatting.Julia enables object documentation via docstrings, and advertises a standard to write such documentations. This has the advantage that the documentation is part of the actual source code, and that a formatted documentation can always be generated from the source code with
Documenter.jl
.Please consider removing the API documentation from the
README.md
, and adding appropriate docstrings to the functions of the module that are part of the public API. I think this would work well together with my suggestion in #7, thus making theREADME.md
a more "high-level" overview of the package.openjournals/joss-reviews#4129
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: