You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thanks for maintaining this crate, much appreciated!
Did you by any chance benchmark this crate against RustFFT or fourier? It looks like they also put some effort into optimizing it, so without benchmarks it is hard to judge if they are on a similar level.
Would also be intersting to benchmark against arrayfire::fft or rgsl::fft to see how pure Rust compares against other solutions.
If there are no benchmarks, maybe you can share what is unique / different about the approach taken in this implementation. Presumably there was a motivation to do something different then RustFFT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@bluenote10 looks like your question remains unanswered. I wanted to ask you in your research were you able to find a good FFT library for Rust? By good, I mean correctly implemented, relatively fast and works without external dependencies.
First of all, thanks for maintaining this crate, much appreciated!
Did you by any chance benchmark this crate against RustFFT or fourier? It looks like they also put some effort into optimizing it, so without benchmarks it is hard to judge if they are on a similar level.
Would also be intersting to benchmark against
arrayfire::fft
orrgsl::fft
to see how pure Rust compares against other solutions.If there are no benchmarks, maybe you can share what is unique / different about the approach taken in this implementation. Presumably there was a motivation to do something different then RustFFT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: