MdePkg/Include: Add define for PLDM response bit #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Aladyshev <aladyshev22@gmail.com>
changab
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2023
changab
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2023
Root cause: 1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return address (#1) is pushed in shadow stack. 2. CET is disabled. 3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to #1. 4. Page table is modified. 5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return address (tianocore#2) is not pushed in shadow stack. 6. CET is enabled. 7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to tianocore#2. #CP exception happens because the actual return address (tianocore#2) doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (#1). Analysis: Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be continue updated with the function called and return (DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect). According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception: Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable, otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET instruction. CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect(). With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of functions for WP & CET operation: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet) WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet) Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch. Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function. Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3 Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com> Cc: Zeng Star <star.zeng@intel.com> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4534 Bug Details: PixieFail Bug #1 CVE-2023-45229 CVSS 6.5 : CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read Change Overview: Introduce Dhcp6SeekInnerOptionSafe which performs checks before seeking the Inner Option from a DHCP6 Option. > > EFI_STATUS > Dhcp6SeekInnerOptionSafe ( > IN UINT16 IaType, > IN UINT8 *Option, > IN UINT32 OptionLen, > OUT UINT8 **IaInnerOpt, > OUT UINT16 *IaInnerLen > ); > Lots of code cleanup to improve code readability. Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com> Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <zachary.clark-williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <doug.edk2@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com>
nicklela
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4534 Bug Details: PixieFail Bug #1 CVE-2023-45229 CVSS 6.5 : CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read Change Overview: Introduce Dhcp6SeekInnerOptionSafe which performs checks before seeking the Inner Option from a DHCP6 Option. > > EFI_STATUS > Dhcp6SeekInnerOptionSafe ( > IN UINT16 IaType, > IN UINT8 *Option, > IN UINT32 OptionLen, > OUT UINT8 **IaInnerOpt, > OUT UINT16 *IaInnerLen > ); > Lots of code cleanup to improve code readability. Bug 4457168 Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com> Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <zachary.clark-williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <doug.edk2@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com> Change-Id: Id19f54826597c79b28b14b36ecb8064d46b804cc Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/c/3rdparty/edk2/+/3073482 Reviewed-by: svcacv <svcacv@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: svc-sw-mobile-l4t <svc-sw-mobile-l4t@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com> GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit <buildbot_gerritrpt@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.