Get Metrics Together

[germonprez]

Is there a good naming convention to get all of the meta-metrics together? Something like:

METRIC.Risk.md
METRIC.Diversity.md

I hate to keep using the word METRIC but right now the metrics are sort of scattered on that front page.

[GeorgLink]

I see the issue ... I was hoping that the README section "Where to contribute" might help, but it does not solve the order of files. A convention could be to use a folder -> makes the repository less approachable (I'm against this idea) I thought about appending "OSSNA" but we want the metrics to transcend. "METRIC" as part of the name would work but is not descriptive of why we do it. Similarly without value is to append zero "0" which will float the files to the top of the list.

[GeorgLink]

We could number the files, float them to the top, and have the same order as on the wiki... :-)

…

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Georg Link ***@***.***> wrote: I see the issue ... I was hoping that the README section "Where to contribute" might help, but it does not solve the order of files. A convention could be to use a folder -> makes the repository less approachable (I'm against this idea) I thought about appending "OSSNA" but we want the metrics to transcend. "METRIC" as part of the name would work but is not descriptive of why we do it. Similarly without value is to append zero "0" which will float the files to the top of the list.

[germonprez]

What does it look like if they have leading numbers? On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Georg J.P. Link <notifications@github.com> wrote:

…

We could number the files, float them to the top, and have the same order as on the wiki... :-) On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Georg Link ***@***.***> wrote: > > I see the issue ... > > I was hoping that the README section "Where to contribute" might help, but > it does not solve the order of files. > > A convention could be to use a folder -> makes the repository less > approachable (I'm against this idea) > I thought about appending "OSSNA" but we want the metrics to transcend. > "METRIC" as part of the name would work but is not descriptive of why we > do it. > Similarly without value is to append zero "0" which will float the files > to the top of the list. > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAoDUJWUn3YCGf8QUVkiFMUj5H7a07DLks5skVB3gaJpZM4PeNfJ> .

-- Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor Information Systems College of Information Science & Technology University of Nebraska Omaha http://faculty.ist.unomaha.edu/mgermonprez/cv.txt

[GeorgLink]

Here is what it would look like:
https://github.com/GeorgLink/metrics/tree/issue6

[germonprez]

I think that looks great.

…

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Georg J.P. Link ***@***.***> wrote: Here is what it would look like: https://github.com/GeorgLink/metrics/tree/issue6 — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAoDUL1lz-qKRGff64F902aIIRuchiLSks5skXcfgaJpZM4PeNfJ> .

-- Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor Information Systems College of Information Science & Technology University of Nebraska Omaha http://faculty.ist.unomaha.edu/mgermonprez/cv.txt

[GeorgLink]

i'll merge it then :-)

[GeorgLink]

feel free to merge pull-request #7 if it looks right.