Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develop Resource Page: Communication Inclusivity: Alternatives #109

Closed
GeorgLink opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Develop Resource Page: Communication Inclusivity: Alternatives #109

GeorgLink opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
T: metric idea This idea is open for discussion. Ideally, fill out a detail page to focus the discussion.

Comments

@GeorgLink
Copy link
Member

This issue is for coordinating around developing the resource page for Communication Inclusivity: Alternatives.

The resource page lives in the following google document for easy editing, commenting, and revision:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e0Y0BhKqEeZeMpcttdFH8Q9NOq-Q6zp78aW-_65hMpc/edit?usp=sharing

Once the page is in a decent shape, we will put a copy of it in the repository as a markdown file.

To work on this issue, feel free to leave a comment here and start editing the document. For questions, feedback requests, and other coordination tasks, please leave a comment here on the issue.

Please edit the google document directly and add your ideas to it. We can help with cleaning it up later.

@GeorgLink GeorgLink added the T: metric idea This idea is open for discussion. Ideally, fill out a detail page to focus the discussion. label Jun 10, 2020
@sgoggins
Copy link
Member

sgoggins commented May 5, 2021

@GeorgLink I think we have addressed communication exclusivity in the metrics spreadsheet.

@GeorgLink
Copy link
Member Author

Yes. I don't remember if there was anything else. Let's close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T: metric idea This idea is open for discussion. Ideally, fill out a detail page to focus the discussion.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants