You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thx for your marvelous work!
When I was trying to reproduce your work in voc2012 dataset, I felt strange about the size of inputting images after cropping operation, should it be like batch* channel321321, same with other methods? In your work the size of images is batch* channel512512 now,if I have not made a mistake.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, we use the crop size 512x512, as illustrated in the paper. We reproduce other methods under the same training setting including the crop size (an example here), so the comparisons are fair. Some papers use the crop size 321x321 but we haven't tried that. I think the experimental phenomenon will be the same (or similar) using different crop sizes.
Thx for your marvelous work!
When I was trying to reproduce your work in voc2012 dataset, I felt strange about the size of inputting images after cropping operation, should it be like batch* channel321321, same with other methods? In your work the size of images is batch* channel512512 now,if I have not made a mistake.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: