You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue addresses the need for a GitHub Actions workflow that automatically assigns reviewers to pull requests upon their opening. Automating the reviewer assignment process will streamline code review processes and ensure timely feedback from team members.
Proposed Feature:
The proposed feature involves the creation of a GitHub Actions workflow that triggers upon the opening of a pull request. This workflow will automatically assign designated reviewers based on predefined list of reviewers in the workflow config.
Expected Behavior:
When a pull request is opened, the workflow should trigger automatically.
Based on defined rules or configurations, reviewers will be assigned to the pull request.
Reviewer assignments should be customizable and adaptable to project-specific requirements.
Benefits:
Streamlines the code review process by automating reviewer assignments.
Ensures timely feedback and reduces bottlenecks in the development workflow.
Improves collaboration and accountability among team members.
Record
I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
I'm a SWOC24 contributor
I want to work on this issue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the feature
This issue addresses the need for a GitHub Actions workflow that automatically assigns reviewers to pull requests upon their opening. Automating the reviewer assignment process will streamline code review processes and ensure timely feedback from team members.
Proposed Feature:
The proposed feature involves the creation of a GitHub Actions workflow that triggers upon the opening of a pull request. This workflow will automatically assign designated reviewers based on predefined list of reviewers in the workflow config.
Expected Behavior:
Benefits:
Record
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: