Odd repetition of a section

[ppasedach]

The writer started the canto on 24B L1 R (with a couple of alterations
to the text), then started the whole canto anew after verse 9 on 24B L4
L, but then numbered it according to the number of verses he had
written, i.e. verse 20 in the MS is actually verse 11, verse 30 is
actually verse 21 etc. (see 25A L3 R; L6 M).

I suppose that if we want to add such an odd repetition of a section to the automatic collation we will have to create a separate file for the first batch of verses 1-9, as it should not be possible to have two instances of the same XML:ID in one file? Or would there be a way of wrapping it in some way, or altering the XML:IDs but providing the information what to collate them with in another way?

[wujastyk]

we have a situation similar to this with a repeated leaf in a Suśrutasaṃhitā manuscript. I'm interested to hear what you suggest

[chchch]

Yes I was thinking about that... I think Dominik @wujastyk is using different @xml:ids with @corresp to link them. Then we could eventually try to collate them as well.

[ppasedach]

Okay,
<lg type="verse" xml:id="HV_13_1x" corresp="HV_13_1">[initial verse at 24B L1 R]</lg>
and
<lg type="verse" xml:id="HV_13_1">[restarted verse at 24B L4 L]</lg>
then? Fine for me.

[chchch]

It would be

 <lg type="verse" xml:id="HV_13_1x" corresp="#HV_13_1">[initial verse at 24B L1 R]</lg>

In this case, when I set up the collation function for @corresp, variants from verse HV_13_1x will be shown in the apparatus for HV_13_1. That's what we want, right?

[wujastyk]

sounds good to me

…

<lg type="verse" xml:id="HV_13_1x" corresp="#HV_13_1">[initial verse at 24B L1 R]</lg> In this case, when I set up the collation function for @corresp, variants from verse HV_13_1x will be shown in the apparatus for HV_13_1. That's what we want, right?

[ppasedach]

It would be

 <lg type="verse" xml:id="HV_13_1x" corresp="#HV_13_1">[initial verse at 24B L1 R]</lg>

In this case, when I set up the collation function for @corresp, variants from verse HV_13_1x will be shown in the apparatus for HV_13_1. That's what we want, right?

Yes, that's it.

[chchch]

Ok let's go with that; I'll stick a label on this issue and get around to it eventually... if you use @corresp now, when I implement collation it should just happen automagically.