Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Information and skipped no longer categorized as Failure #2074

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

Sae86
Copy link
Contributor

@Sae86 Sae86 commented Mar 7, 2024

No description provided.

@Sae86 Sae86 added next release validation required Additional validation required before merge labels Mar 7, 2024
@Sae86 Sae86 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 7, 2024 22:18
@@ -132,7 +132,9 @@ def getReturnCode(self, result: int) -> int:

def getModuleResultName(res) -> str:
if chipsec.chipset.cs().using_return_codes:
return 'Passed' if (res & 0xFFFFFFFF00000000) == 0 else 'Failed'
result_mask = 0xFFFFFFFF00000000
status = [0, 1, 256]
Copy link
Member

@npmitche npmitche Mar 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use [ModuleResult.status.SUCCESS[0], ModuleResult.status.INFORMATION[0], ModuleResult.status.NOT_APPLICABLE[0]] instead of [0, 1, 256]?

Signed-off-by: Sae86 <sara.batllori@intel.com>
@Sae86 Sae86 removed the validation required Additional validation required before merge label Mar 15, 2024
@dscott90 dscott90 merged commit 303e128 into chipsec:main Mar 18, 2024
44 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants