Add raf.polyfillObject #35
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ljharb
reviewed
Sep 30, 2017
I had that at first, but didn't want to overload the method. Can do that instead though if maintainers don't mind 🙂 |
|
Changed it to be just the |
|
Awesome, thanks for the contribution! |
|
Published as v3.4.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes it easier to add the polyfills from outside of the context.
EDIT: This is probably too naive as the implementation does some checks against
rootwhich I'd want to be different in my case. Can split it into two files so that I can inject my ownglobalI suppose. WDYT?