New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: account for bandwidth manager now being disabled by default #16782
docs: account for bandwidth manager now being disabled by default #16782
Conversation
#16380 disabled the bandwidth manager by default. Signed-off-by: Bruno Miguel Custódio <brunomcustodio@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruno Miguel Custódio <brunomcustodio@gmail.com>
This PR has got positive reviews from the two owner teams, bpf and docs-structure. The documentation checks are passing. The RST checks failed, but the GitHub action is known to fail (and there's a pending PR to remove it anyway), and that failure should be ignored. For these reasons, I'm marking as ready-to-merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One question below. LGTM otherwise.
* - startupProbe.periodSeconds | ||
- interval between checks of the startup probe | ||
- int | ||
- ``2`` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have these changes been included by mistake?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I'm pretty sure this is intentional. They are in a separate commit (along with the spelling list update).
We've had the Helm reference for a few weeks now, and people should update it when they touch the Helm values. The CI is supposed to catch omissions, but there was a bug and a few changes to the Helm values were not reported to Documentation/helm-values.rst.
Now that the CI has been fixed, the documentation action - which will run for this PR - should complain that the Helm values are missing in the reference. This is why Bruno updated it - to fix the reference, and to have the GH action pass. The changes to the spelling wordlist in the same commit are in fact needed to account for the new words added to the Helm reference in this update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Ok, makes sense. That information should ideally be in the commit message though :-)
#16380 disabled the bandwidth manager by default.