New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PLOS style references include "[Internet]" for preprints and books #4138
Comments
This issue hasn't seen any activity in the past 30 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs in the next two weeks. |
Activity. It might make sense to address this issue at the same time as #4140, which also concerns the PLOS CSL. Noting that there are other minor issues with the PLOS CSL as commented on at greenelab/meta-review#241 (comment). |
This issue hasn't seen any activity in the past 30 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs in the next two weeks. |
Still not resolved |
This issue hasn't seen any activity in the past 30 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs in the next two weeks. |
@probot not resolved yet |
Fix issues regarding [internet] and [preprint] for PLoS as per: citation-style-language#4138 (and pointed out again here: citation-style-language#4140 (comment)) Please check carefully if I did this correctly. :)
* Update plos.csl Fix issues regarding [internet] and [preprint] for PLoS as per: #4138 (and pointed out again here: #4140 (comment)) Please check carefully if I did this correctly. :) * Update plos.csl * Update plos.csl
I think we're finally done here |
PLOS Computational Biology specifies including
[Internet]
after the title for specific types of references:For other types, examples do not include
[Internet]
, such as:Note that arXiv is listed under both "Databases and repositories" and "Deposited articles", although I think the later is a more accurate categorization for preprints.
Currently the CSL Style for PLOS Computational Biology, which inherits from PLOS, places
[Internet]
after many reference types that fall under the later categories above. It seems that the presence of a URL in the CSL JSON is sometimes used to determine whether[Internet]
should be added:styles/plos.csl
Lines 163 to 170 in 76e2ff8
Note that most citeable works these days have a URL, but that doesn't mean they fall into the internet categories above.
We noticed this issue when creating this reference list. Notice the following examples of how CSL JSON was converted to a reference.
csl json:
type
isentry
, but switching tobook
does not remove[Internet]
:csl json. Type is
manuscript
for a bioRxiv preprint:csl json for an arXiv preprint where type is
report
:csl json for report type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: