Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CRM-20237 Don't add in extra copy of ids and only use most recent id … #10929

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2017

Conversation

seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

@seamuslee001 seamuslee001 commented Sep 1, 2017

…copied from in title and don't put copy of details in name for pricesets

Overview

Previously when copying a price set it would just continuouly add in copy_id_x etc onto the end of the name and title. Now it only adds the most recent price set id on the title the name is just the new id with Price_set

@eileenmcnaughton does this make sense to you?

…copied from in title and don't put copy of details in name for pricesets
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

eileenmcnaughton commented Sep 1, 2017

The title is a clear improvement.

screenshot 2017-09-01 13 35 33

vs
screenshot 2017-09-01 13 34 59

However, I think it's nice to keep some of the title in the name - currently we are seeing

screenshot 2017-09-01 13 35 57

I think this is nicer
screenshot 2017-09-01 13 36 05

eileenmcnaughton@19694eb

gives the second version

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eileenmcnaughton yep happy with that have cherry-picked and updated tests

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

OK - - we'll need to find another merge now I've collaborated - @totten @colemanw @monishdeb - any of you able to merge this if is passes? (or give merge on pass)

@colemanw colemanw merged commit def623a into civicrm:master Sep 4, 2017
@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the CRM-20237 branch September 4, 2017 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants