Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG update requirements to properly match python 2 #59

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2017
Merged

Conversation

beckermr
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates the requirements file to properly match python 2.7.

See here https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0496/#examples

Copy link
Contributor

@mheilman mheilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not just have the < 3.0 part?

Also, is there documentation somewhere about putting and in there like this? I couldn't find it easily.

(Relatedly, does it say anywhere that we require >= 2.7? It might be nice to add to the readme and make it so that info shows up on pypi, but that seems like a separate PR.)

@beckermr
Copy link
Contributor Author

See this https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0496/#examples. The and is totally fine.

Happy to just have < '3.0'.

We don't require 2.7, but I doubt things work on older versions.

@beckermr beckermr assigned mheilman and unassigned samcarlos Sep 12, 2017
@beckermr beckermr removed the request for review from samcarlos September 12, 2017 15:57
Copy link
Contributor

@mheilman mheilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheilman
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pep link. I mainly suggested the change because I couldn't easily verify that the syntax was correct. :-)

@beckermr beckermr merged commit 603943c into master Sep 12, 2017
@beckermr beckermr deleted the fix-req branch September 12, 2017 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants