Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

is there any reason to use the 5.0.0b9 version of frictionless? #93

Open
KatiRG opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

is there any reason to use the 5.0.0b9 version of frictionless? #93

KatiRG opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@KatiRG
Copy link

KatiRG commented Nov 1, 2023

I am testing out using custom checks such as this example, and got an error that type is required (frictionless/schema/field.py). This requirement was removed in frictionless on June 13 (frictionlessdata/frictionless-py@fdcb91e) and I'm wondering why the ckanext-validations repo is not using this version or later?

The requirements file has frictionless pinned to 5.0.0b9.

@aimalkhan
Copy link

there is a PR https://github.com/frictionlessdata/ckanext-validation/pull/88/files to update the version to 5.13.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants