Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Visible Aliases for PossibleValue #5480

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

naftulikay
Copy link

@naftulikay naftulikay commented May 1, 2024

Before this change, it was not possible to have visible aliases for PossibleValues, all aliases were hidden in help output. This change adds a new API for adding visible aliases and modifies the help generation scheme to display these visible aliases.

Tracking issue: #4416

@naftulikay naftulikay force-pushed the feature/derive-visible-aliases branch 5 times, most recently from f984aa5 to b267197 Compare May 1, 2024 22:30
@epage
Copy link
Member

epage commented May 2, 2024

As a heads up, I'll be traveling for the next week or so and so it might take a bit before I get to this

@naftulikay naftulikay force-pushed the feature/derive-visible-aliases branch from b267197 to 10d27be Compare May 2, 2024 15:12
Before this change, it was not possible to have *visible* aliases
for PossibleValues, all aliases were hidden in help output. This
change adds a new API for adding visible aliases and modifies the
help generation scheme to display these visible aliases.
@naftulikay naftulikay force-pushed the feature/derive-visible-aliases branch from 10d27be to 5c6f832 Compare May 2, 2024 15:15
Comment on lines 41 to +42
aliases: Vec<Str>, // (name, visible)
visible_aliases: Vec<Str>,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, that comment wasn't accurate when it was copied here but it shows that aliases are generally stored in a single Vec, rather than in parallel ones. Let's do the same here.

///
/// If there are no visible aliases, this will simply emit the formatted name, if there are visible aliases, these
/// will be appended like this: `name [aliases: a, b, c]`.
pub fn render_help_prefix_long(&self, literal: &Style) -> String {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • This doesn't seem like it needs to be public
  • This is coupled to the help rendering and should be there
  • This returns a String which should only be used for unstyled text. Instead, this should return a StyledStr

Comment on lines +136 to +138
/// Add a _visible_ alias to this [PossibleValue].
///
/// Unlike [PossibleValue::alias], these aliases will show in help output.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs an example

Comment on lines +139 to +140
#[must_use]
pub fn visible_alias(mut self, name: impl IntoResettable<Str>) -> Self {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a test. Ideally, the test is added in a prior commit, with a regular alias, and should pass. In this commit, it would then change to a visible alias with the expected output updated.

Being this particular makes it very easy to show anyone (1) what is supported today, (2) what this new feature looks like, and (3) how the behavior is different than what is there today.

One of the big design questions that needs discussion in #4416 is what the help output should be like for this. Note that the design conversation should happen there.

Comment on lines +139 to +140
#[must_use]
pub fn visible_alias(mut self, name: impl IntoResettable<Str>) -> Self {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Search for aliases_command and add cases that use this (and invisible aliases)

Again, modify the tests in a prior commit (pass) and then switch tests from regular aliases to visible aliases.

@epage
Copy link
Member

epage commented Jun 23, 2024

Hmm, when I marked #4416 as ready for implementation, I had overlooked that we needed a design conversation on the help output first. I ended up starting this review before I realized it. I would recommend we focus the conversation on the help output and have it in #4416 before focusing too much more on the implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants