Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bit repr deriving for Records and Infix data types #2191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2022

Conversation

rowanG077
Copy link
Member

There were some missing constructors. GADT still aren't supported.

Still TODO:

  • Write a changelog entry (see changelog/README.md)
  • Check copyright notices are up to date in edited files

I didn't update the copyright in the test files since it seems that test files don't have copyright notices.

@rowanG077 rowanG077 force-pushed the fix-BitRepr-deriving branch 2 times, most recently from bdc8d2b to 4c635b8 Compare May 6, 2022 13:14
using `Clash.Annotations.BitRepresentation.Deriving.deriveAnnotation`.
@alex-mckenna alex-mckenna merged commit acf574a into master May 12, 2022
@alex-mckenna alex-mckenna deleted the fix-BitRepr-deriving branch May 12, 2022 07:30
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2022
using `Clash.Annotations.BitRepresentation.Deriving.deriveAnnotation`.

(cherry picked from commit acf574a)
alex-mckenna pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2022
using `Clash.Annotations.BitRepresentation.Deriving.deriveAnnotation`.

(cherry picked from commit acf574a)

Co-authored-by: Rowan Goemans <goemansrowan@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants